TY - JOUR
T1 - Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains
T2 - Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership
AU - Boulay, Anne Marie
AU - Drastig, Katrin
AU - Amanullah, null
AU - Chapagain, Ashok
AU - Charlon, Veronica
AU - Civit, Bárbara
AU - DeCamillis, Camillo
AU - De Souza, Marlos
AU - Hess, Tim
AU - Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
AU - Ibidhi, Ridha
AU - Lathuillière, Michael J.
AU - Manzardo, Alessandro
AU - McAllister, Tim
AU - Morales, Ricardo A.
AU - Motoshita, Masaharu
AU - Palhares, Julio Cesar Pascale
AU - Pirlo, Giacomo
AU - Ridoutt, Brad
AU - Russo, Valentina
AU - Salmoral, Gloria
AU - Singh, Ranvir
AU - Vanham, Davy
AU - Wiedemann, Stephen
AU - Zheng, Weichao
AU - Pfister, Stephan
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only “blue water”); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including “green” and “blue water” consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
AB - The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only “blue water”); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including “green” and “blue water” consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
KW - Livestock production
KW - Water footprinting
KW - Water productivity
KW - Water scarcity footprint
KW - Water use assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099705464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107391
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099705464
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 124
JO - Ecological indicators
JF - Ecological indicators
M1 - 107391
ER -