Building of academics' networks: An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory

Rhoda Ahoba-Sam, David Charles

Research output: Working paperProfessional

48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Individual academic scientists engage in various collaborations through their involvement in both regional and extra-regional networks. However, little is known about how these networks are actually formed. Focusing on university and industry networks, we take the view that the process of building new networks is an entrepreneurial activity that involves unpredictability and often goal ambiguity. This paper thus employs the theories of causation and effectuation to explore how the personal networks of academics are initiated. With evidence from the networks of 12 academics based at the University of Stavanger, Norway we show that both causation and effectuation are employed by academics when building their networks. The usage of causation was found to be more consistent with building industry networks whereas effectuation was employed when building networks in academia. Consequently, effectuation was characteristic of the international networks which were found to be mostly constituted by other academics. On the regional level, a mixture of both approaches of causation and effectuation was observed, with more industry linkages suggesting a tendency to be more causal than effectual. Furthermore, while causation was employed for project level networking, effectuation was employed for establishing more individual level ties.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCenter for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)
Number of pages24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameRUNIN Working Paper Series
No.06
Volume2019
ISSN (Electronic)2535-5686

Fingerprint

industry
new building
Norway
networking
university
evidence

Cite this

Ahoba-Sam, R., & Charles, D. (2019). Building of academics' networks: An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory. (RUNIN Working Paper Series; Vol. 2019, No. 06). Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2535-5686.2019.06
Ahoba-Sam, Rhoda ; Charles, David. / Building of academics' networks : An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), 2019. (RUNIN Working Paper Series; 06).
@techreport{ddec1aff217242a697bd9625040fbde4,
title = "Building of academics' networks: An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory",
abstract = "Individual academic scientists engage in various collaborations through their involvement in both regional and extra-regional networks. However, little is known about how these networks are actually formed. Focusing on university and industry networks, we take the view that the process of building new networks is an entrepreneurial activity that involves unpredictability and often goal ambiguity. This paper thus employs the theories of causation and effectuation to explore how the personal networks of academics are initiated. With evidence from the networks of 12 academics based at the University of Stavanger, Norway we show that both causation and effectuation are employed by academics when building their networks. The usage of causation was found to be more consistent with building industry networks whereas effectuation was employed when building networks in academia. Consequently, effectuation was characteristic of the international networks which were found to be mostly constituted by other academics. On the regional level, a mixture of both approaches of causation and effectuation was observed, with more industry linkages suggesting a tendency to be more causal than effectual. Furthermore, while causation was employed for project level networking, effectuation was employed for establishing more individual level ties.",
author = "Rhoda Ahoba-Sam and David Charles",
note = "Subseries of the CHEPS working paper series as part of the UT & ECIU RUNIN Ph.D. training network. Paul Benneworth is the series editor This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 722295 RUNIN Project Summer School {"}Universities and Regional Impact{"}, 25-29 June 2018, Enschede",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.3990/4.2535-5686.2019.06",
language = "English",
series = "RUNIN Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)",
number = "06",
address = "Netherlands",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)",

}

Ahoba-Sam, R & Charles, D 2019 'Building of academics' networks: An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory' RUNIN Working Paper Series, no. 06, vol. 2019, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2535-5686.2019.06

Building of academics' networks : An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory. / Ahoba-Sam, Rhoda; Charles, David.

Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), 2019. (RUNIN Working Paper Series; Vol. 2019, No. 06).

Research output: Working paperProfessional

TY - UNPB

T1 - Building of academics' networks

T2 - An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory

AU - Ahoba-Sam, Rhoda

AU - Charles, David

N1 - Subseries of the CHEPS working paper series as part of the UT & ECIU RUNIN Ph.D. training network. Paul Benneworth is the series editor This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 722295 RUNIN Project Summer School "Universities and Regional Impact", 25-29 June 2018, Enschede

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Individual academic scientists engage in various collaborations through their involvement in both regional and extra-regional networks. However, little is known about how these networks are actually formed. Focusing on university and industry networks, we take the view that the process of building new networks is an entrepreneurial activity that involves unpredictability and often goal ambiguity. This paper thus employs the theories of causation and effectuation to explore how the personal networks of academics are initiated. With evidence from the networks of 12 academics based at the University of Stavanger, Norway we show that both causation and effectuation are employed by academics when building their networks. The usage of causation was found to be more consistent with building industry networks whereas effectuation was employed when building networks in academia. Consequently, effectuation was characteristic of the international networks which were found to be mostly constituted by other academics. On the regional level, a mixture of both approaches of causation and effectuation was observed, with more industry linkages suggesting a tendency to be more causal than effectual. Furthermore, while causation was employed for project level networking, effectuation was employed for establishing more individual level ties.

AB - Individual academic scientists engage in various collaborations through their involvement in both regional and extra-regional networks. However, little is known about how these networks are actually formed. Focusing on university and industry networks, we take the view that the process of building new networks is an entrepreneurial activity that involves unpredictability and often goal ambiguity. This paper thus employs the theories of causation and effectuation to explore how the personal networks of academics are initiated. With evidence from the networks of 12 academics based at the University of Stavanger, Norway we show that both causation and effectuation are employed by academics when building their networks. The usage of causation was found to be more consistent with building industry networks whereas effectuation was employed when building networks in academia. Consequently, effectuation was characteristic of the international networks which were found to be mostly constituted by other academics. On the regional level, a mixture of both approaches of causation and effectuation was observed, with more industry linkages suggesting a tendency to be more causal than effectual. Furthermore, while causation was employed for project level networking, effectuation was employed for establishing more individual level ties.

U2 - 10.3990/4.2535-5686.2019.06

DO - 10.3990/4.2535-5686.2019.06

M3 - Working paper

T3 - RUNIN Working Paper Series

BT - Building of academics' networks

PB - Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)

ER -

Ahoba-Sam R, Charles D. Building of academics' networks: An analysis based on causation and effectuation theory. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). 2019. (RUNIN Working Paper Series; 06). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2535-5686.2019.06