Building Strength or Lending an Ear in Legal Conflicts: Dependence and Conflict Asymmetry as Distinct Predictors of Needs for Support

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Being aware of psychological aspects of legal conflicts can benefit the efficiency of legal aid. We propose that needs for support may be particularly dependent upon the experience of asymmetry between conflict parties. We distinguish between two types of asymmetry and examine how they relate to different needs for support. We hypothesized that dependence asymmetry (being more dependent on the other party than vice versa) would predict a need for problem-focused help. Conflict asymmetry (experiencing more conflict than the other side) was expected to increase the need for emotion-focused help, particularly when people have a weak social network. We tested these hypotheses with a survey among 700 legal aid clients. Results showed that dependence asymmetry was indeed a strong and positive predictor of problem-focused empowerment needs, whereas conflict asymmetry positively and significantly predicted the need for emotion-focused help, particularly in the absence of wider social support.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-21
JournalNegotiation and conflict management research
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

asymmetry
legal aid
emotion
Predictors
Asymmetry
Power (Psychology)
social support
empowerment
social network
efficiency
experience
Emotion

Keywords

  • METIS-315618
  • IR-99287

Cite this

@article{879f825f0650448688dcbca85122a29c,
title = "Building Strength or Lending an Ear in Legal Conflicts: Dependence and Conflict Asymmetry as Distinct Predictors of Needs for Support",
abstract = "Being aware of psychological aspects of legal conflicts can benefit the efficiency of legal aid. We propose that needs for support may be particularly dependent upon the experience of asymmetry between conflict parties. We distinguish between two types of asymmetry and examine how they relate to different needs for support. We hypothesized that dependence asymmetry (being more dependent on the other party than vice versa) would predict a need for problem-focused help. Conflict asymmetry (experiencing more conflict than the other side) was expected to increase the need for emotion-focused help, particularly when people have a weak social network. We tested these hypotheses with a survey among 700 legal aid clients. Results showed that dependence asymmetry was indeed a strong and positive predictor of problem-focused empowerment needs, whereas conflict asymmetry positively and significantly predicted the need for emotion-focused help, particularly in the absence of wider social support.",
keywords = "METIS-315618, IR-99287",
author = "{van Dijk}, {Maria Anna Jozefa} and Ellen Giebels and Sven Zebel",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/ncmr.12066",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "3--21",
journal = "Negotiation and conflict management research",
issn = "1750-4716",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building Strength or Lending an Ear in Legal Conflicts: Dependence and Conflict Asymmetry as Distinct Predictors of Needs for Support

AU - van Dijk, Maria Anna Jozefa

AU - Giebels, Ellen

AU - Zebel, Sven

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Being aware of psychological aspects of legal conflicts can benefit the efficiency of legal aid. We propose that needs for support may be particularly dependent upon the experience of asymmetry between conflict parties. We distinguish between two types of asymmetry and examine how they relate to different needs for support. We hypothesized that dependence asymmetry (being more dependent on the other party than vice versa) would predict a need for problem-focused help. Conflict asymmetry (experiencing more conflict than the other side) was expected to increase the need for emotion-focused help, particularly when people have a weak social network. We tested these hypotheses with a survey among 700 legal aid clients. Results showed that dependence asymmetry was indeed a strong and positive predictor of problem-focused empowerment needs, whereas conflict asymmetry positively and significantly predicted the need for emotion-focused help, particularly in the absence of wider social support.

AB - Being aware of psychological aspects of legal conflicts can benefit the efficiency of legal aid. We propose that needs for support may be particularly dependent upon the experience of asymmetry between conflict parties. We distinguish between two types of asymmetry and examine how they relate to different needs for support. We hypothesized that dependence asymmetry (being more dependent on the other party than vice versa) would predict a need for problem-focused help. Conflict asymmetry (experiencing more conflict than the other side) was expected to increase the need for emotion-focused help, particularly when people have a weak social network. We tested these hypotheses with a survey among 700 legal aid clients. Results showed that dependence asymmetry was indeed a strong and positive predictor of problem-focused empowerment needs, whereas conflict asymmetry positively and significantly predicted the need for emotion-focused help, particularly in the absence of wider social support.

KW - METIS-315618

KW - IR-99287

U2 - 10.1111/ncmr.12066

DO - 10.1111/ncmr.12066

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 3

EP - 21

JO - Negotiation and conflict management research

JF - Negotiation and conflict management research

SN - 1750-4716

IS - 1

ER -