Can the technological mediation approach improve technology assessment? A critical view from ‘within’

Bas de Boer (Corresponding Author), Jonne Hoek, Olga Kudina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The technological mediation approach aspires to complement current Technology Assessment (TA) practices. It aims to do so by addressing ethical concerns from ‘within’ human-technology relations leading to ethical Constructive Technology Assessment (eCTA), as articulated by Kiran, Asle H., Nelly Oudshoorn, and Peter-Paul Verbeek in their 2015 article. In this paper, we problematize this ambition. Firstly, we situate the technological mediation approach in the history of TA. Secondly, as a study into the normativity from ‘within’ human-technology relations, we reveal the phenomenological and existential origins of Verbeek's technological mediation approach. Thirdly, we show that there are two possible readings of this approach: a strong and a weak one. The weak reading can augment current TA practices but is eventually uncommitted to the idea of technological mediation. The strong reading defines a wholly new scope for our engagement with (emerging) technologies but is incompatible with existing TA approaches
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-315
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of responsible innovation
Volume5
Issue number3
Early online date16 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Technology assessment
Mediation
Normativity
Emerging technologies
Constructive technology assessment

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Ethics
  • Technological mediation
  • Normativity
  • Postphenomenology
  • Technology assessment

Cite this

@article{772a28f7fad44801986a9337bcaef453,
title = "Can the technological mediation approach improve technology assessment? A critical view from ‘within’",
abstract = "The technological mediation approach aspires to complement current Technology Assessment (TA) practices. It aims to do so by addressing ethical concerns from ‘within’ human-technology relations leading to ethical Constructive Technology Assessment (eCTA), as articulated by Kiran, Asle H., Nelly Oudshoorn, and Peter-Paul Verbeek in their 2015 article. In this paper, we problematize this ambition. Firstly, we situate the technological mediation approach in the history of TA. Secondly, as a study into the normativity from ‘within’ human-technology relations, we reveal the phenomenological and existential origins of Verbeek's technological mediation approach. Thirdly, we show that there are two possible readings of this approach: a strong and a weak one. The weak reading can augment current TA practices but is eventually uncommitted to the idea of technological mediation. The strong reading defines a wholly new scope for our engagement with (emerging) technologies but is incompatible with existing TA approaches",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Ethics, Technological mediation, Normativity, Postphenomenology, Technology assessment",
author = "{de Boer}, Bas and Jonne Hoek and Olga Kudina",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/23299460.2018.1495029",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "299--315",
journal = "Journal of responsible innovation",
issn = "2329-9460",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Can the technological mediation approach improve technology assessment? A critical view from ‘within’. / de Boer, Bas (Corresponding Author); Hoek, Jonne; Kudina, Olga .

In: Journal of responsible innovation, Vol. 5, No. 3, 02.09.2018, p. 299-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can the technological mediation approach improve technology assessment? A critical view from ‘within’

AU - de Boer, Bas

AU - Hoek, Jonne

AU - Kudina, Olga

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2018/9/2

Y1 - 2018/9/2

N2 - The technological mediation approach aspires to complement current Technology Assessment (TA) practices. It aims to do so by addressing ethical concerns from ‘within’ human-technology relations leading to ethical Constructive Technology Assessment (eCTA), as articulated by Kiran, Asle H., Nelly Oudshoorn, and Peter-Paul Verbeek in their 2015 article. In this paper, we problematize this ambition. Firstly, we situate the technological mediation approach in the history of TA. Secondly, as a study into the normativity from ‘within’ human-technology relations, we reveal the phenomenological and existential origins of Verbeek's technological mediation approach. Thirdly, we show that there are two possible readings of this approach: a strong and a weak one. The weak reading can augment current TA practices but is eventually uncommitted to the idea of technological mediation. The strong reading defines a wholly new scope for our engagement with (emerging) technologies but is incompatible with existing TA approaches

AB - The technological mediation approach aspires to complement current Technology Assessment (TA) practices. It aims to do so by addressing ethical concerns from ‘within’ human-technology relations leading to ethical Constructive Technology Assessment (eCTA), as articulated by Kiran, Asle H., Nelly Oudshoorn, and Peter-Paul Verbeek in their 2015 article. In this paper, we problematize this ambition. Firstly, we situate the technological mediation approach in the history of TA. Secondly, as a study into the normativity from ‘within’ human-technology relations, we reveal the phenomenological and existential origins of Verbeek's technological mediation approach. Thirdly, we show that there are two possible readings of this approach: a strong and a weak one. The weak reading can augment current TA practices but is eventually uncommitted to the idea of technological mediation. The strong reading defines a wholly new scope for our engagement with (emerging) technologies but is incompatible with existing TA approaches

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Ethics

KW - Technological mediation

KW - Normativity

KW - Postphenomenology

KW - Technology assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049931622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23299460.2018.1495029

DO - 10.1080/23299460.2018.1495029

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 299

EP - 315

JO - Journal of responsible innovation

JF - Journal of responsible innovation

SN - 2329-9460

IS - 3

ER -