Capturing the competence of management consulting work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
72 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to assess whether the effort of consulting firms and branch organizations to establish a shared and standardized methodology as a means to professionalize consulting and as a standard for training is possible and sensible. - Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted among Dutch management consultants, which explored their ways of working and their ways of learning. - Findings: The study shows that efforts to develop a shared and standardized phase-model methodology do not seem to be effective. Instead of following phase-models, consultants appear to be improvising bricoleurs, tailoring their ways of working to specific situations, and using broad, heterogeneous and partly implicit repertoires, which are built through mainly through action-learning. This requires another kind of methodology and another kind of training. - Research limitations/implications: The article gives a general direction for the development of a consulting methodology and the education of consultants. Further research on consulting practices and repertoires is necessary to explore this direction. - Practical implications: The paper concludes that the value of phase-models as a standard is limited. Therefore, branch organizations, consulting firms and corporate universities should not focus their professionalization and training activities on these standardized methods. - Originality/value: Little work has been done yet on the relation between professionalization, methods, and training in management consulting, and no earlier publication has studied this topic quantitatively.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)248-260
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of workplace learning
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • phase-models
  • management consulting
  • professional training
  • METIS-233171
  • Competence
  • Professionalization
  • Knowledge Management
  • IR-73431

Cite this

@article{36fe438a9cc0408288e6cc6946efedca,
title = "Capturing the competence of management consulting work",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this article is to assess whether the effort of consulting firms and branch organizations to establish a shared and standardized methodology as a means to professionalize consulting and as a standard for training is possible and sensible. - Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted among Dutch management consultants, which explored their ways of working and their ways of learning. - Findings: The study shows that efforts to develop a shared and standardized phase-model methodology do not seem to be effective. Instead of following phase-models, consultants appear to be improvising bricoleurs, tailoring their ways of working to specific situations, and using broad, heterogeneous and partly implicit repertoires, which are built through mainly through action-learning. This requires another kind of methodology and another kind of training. - Research limitations/implications: The article gives a general direction for the development of a consulting methodology and the education of consultants. Further research on consulting practices and repertoires is necessary to explore this direction. - Practical implications: The paper concludes that the value of phase-models as a standard is limited. Therefore, branch organizations, consulting firms and corporate universities should not focus their professionalization and training activities on these standardized methods. - Originality/value: Little work has been done yet on the relation between professionalization, methods, and training in management consulting, and no earlier publication has studied this topic quantitatively.",
keywords = "phase-models, management consulting, professional training, METIS-233171, Competence, Professionalization, Knowledge Management, IR-73431",
author = "Klaasjan Visscher",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1108/13665620610665845",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "18",
pages = "248--260",
journal = "Journal of workplace learning",
issn = "1366-5626",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Capturing the competence of management consulting work. / Visscher, Klaasjan.

In: Journal of workplace learning, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2006, p. 248-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capturing the competence of management consulting work

AU - Visscher, Klaasjan

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this article is to assess whether the effort of consulting firms and branch organizations to establish a shared and standardized methodology as a means to professionalize consulting and as a standard for training is possible and sensible. - Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted among Dutch management consultants, which explored their ways of working and their ways of learning. - Findings: The study shows that efforts to develop a shared and standardized phase-model methodology do not seem to be effective. Instead of following phase-models, consultants appear to be improvising bricoleurs, tailoring their ways of working to specific situations, and using broad, heterogeneous and partly implicit repertoires, which are built through mainly through action-learning. This requires another kind of methodology and another kind of training. - Research limitations/implications: The article gives a general direction for the development of a consulting methodology and the education of consultants. Further research on consulting practices and repertoires is necessary to explore this direction. - Practical implications: The paper concludes that the value of phase-models as a standard is limited. Therefore, branch organizations, consulting firms and corporate universities should not focus their professionalization and training activities on these standardized methods. - Originality/value: Little work has been done yet on the relation between professionalization, methods, and training in management consulting, and no earlier publication has studied this topic quantitatively.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this article is to assess whether the effort of consulting firms and branch organizations to establish a shared and standardized methodology as a means to professionalize consulting and as a standard for training is possible and sensible. - Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted among Dutch management consultants, which explored their ways of working and their ways of learning. - Findings: The study shows that efforts to develop a shared and standardized phase-model methodology do not seem to be effective. Instead of following phase-models, consultants appear to be improvising bricoleurs, tailoring their ways of working to specific situations, and using broad, heterogeneous and partly implicit repertoires, which are built through mainly through action-learning. This requires another kind of methodology and another kind of training. - Research limitations/implications: The article gives a general direction for the development of a consulting methodology and the education of consultants. Further research on consulting practices and repertoires is necessary to explore this direction. - Practical implications: The paper concludes that the value of phase-models as a standard is limited. Therefore, branch organizations, consulting firms and corporate universities should not focus their professionalization and training activities on these standardized methods. - Originality/value: Little work has been done yet on the relation between professionalization, methods, and training in management consulting, and no earlier publication has studied this topic quantitatively.

KW - phase-models

KW - management consulting

KW - professional training

KW - METIS-233171

KW - Competence

KW - Professionalization

KW - Knowledge Management

KW - IR-73431

U2 - 10.1108/13665620610665845

DO - 10.1108/13665620610665845

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 248

EP - 260

JO - Journal of workplace learning

JF - Journal of workplace learning

SN - 1366-5626

IS - 4

ER -