Changing governance of supply chains in the building industry

Johannes T. Voordijk, Job de Haan, Geert-Jan Joosten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While the process of deregulation supported the use of market mechanisms in the building industry, it also means that manufacturers, contractors and architects have become the dominant parties in the supply chains. The objective of this paper is to explain the paradox that deregulation (more market) has inspired more hierarchical forms of organising supply chains of building projects. Concepts from transaction cost economics are used for analysing circumstances under which new co-ordination mechanisms develop. In a multiple case study, firms that are analysed are involved in different stages of supply chains in the building industry. The case studies show one of the partners in the supply chain may take the role of director to improve efficiency as well as to reduce co-ordination costs. Which partner takes this role depends on the specific product–market combination under investigation
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)217-226
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean journal of purchasing and supply management
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Keywords

  • METIS-124098
  • IR-85930

Cite this

@article{bf73fcafd2f644f09a66838aa3215e23,
title = "Changing governance of supply chains in the building industry",
abstract = "While the process of deregulation supported the use of market mechanisms in the building industry, it also means that manufacturers, contractors and architects have become the dominant parties in the supply chains. The objective of this paper is to explain the paradox that deregulation (more market) has inspired more hierarchical forms of organising supply chains of building projects. Concepts from transaction cost economics are used for analysing circumstances under which new co-ordination mechanisms develop. In a multiple case study, firms that are analysed are involved in different stages of supply chains in the building industry. The case studies show one of the partners in the supply chain may take the role of director to improve efficiency as well as to reduce co-ordination costs. Which partner takes this role depends on the specific product–market combination under investigation",
keywords = "METIS-124098, IR-85930",
author = "Voordijk, {Johannes T.} and {de Haan}, Job and Geert-Jan Joosten",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00017-4",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "6",
pages = "217--226",
journal = "Journal of purchasing and supply management",
issn = "1478-4092",
publisher = "Butterworth Scientific Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Changing governance of supply chains in the building industry. / Voordijk, Johannes T.; de Haan, Job; Joosten, Geert-Jan.

In: European journal of purchasing and supply management, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000, p. 217-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing governance of supply chains in the building industry

AU - Voordijk, Johannes T.

AU - de Haan, Job

AU - Joosten, Geert-Jan

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - While the process of deregulation supported the use of market mechanisms in the building industry, it also means that manufacturers, contractors and architects have become the dominant parties in the supply chains. The objective of this paper is to explain the paradox that deregulation (more market) has inspired more hierarchical forms of organising supply chains of building projects. Concepts from transaction cost economics are used for analysing circumstances under which new co-ordination mechanisms develop. In a multiple case study, firms that are analysed are involved in different stages of supply chains in the building industry. The case studies show one of the partners in the supply chain may take the role of director to improve efficiency as well as to reduce co-ordination costs. Which partner takes this role depends on the specific product–market combination under investigation

AB - While the process of deregulation supported the use of market mechanisms in the building industry, it also means that manufacturers, contractors and architects have become the dominant parties in the supply chains. The objective of this paper is to explain the paradox that deregulation (more market) has inspired more hierarchical forms of organising supply chains of building projects. Concepts from transaction cost economics are used for analysing circumstances under which new co-ordination mechanisms develop. In a multiple case study, firms that are analysed are involved in different stages of supply chains in the building industry. The case studies show one of the partners in the supply chain may take the role of director to improve efficiency as well as to reduce co-ordination costs. Which partner takes this role depends on the specific product–market combination under investigation

KW - METIS-124098

KW - IR-85930

U2 - 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00017-4

DO - 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00017-4

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 217

EP - 226

JO - Journal of purchasing and supply management

JF - Journal of purchasing and supply management

SN - 1478-4092

IS - 3

ER -