Abstract
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has advanced in various regions. While analyses have predominantly focused on its political and economic impacts, its legal aspects received less attention. This article explores whether the Chinese legal model implemented via the initiative represents a novel approach to international law-making. The focus is on its application in theMiddle East andNorth Africa, where a set of primary mechanisms are utilised: soft law instruments that establish a theoretical and practical framework for collaboration. The author provides a comparative analysis of the European Union (EU) and United States (US) legal models, considering the overall pros and cons of Beijing’s strategy. The article concludes that while these mechanisms represent a pragmatic governance model relying on flexible rules, they are not a novel approach. The US and the EU have employed such soft law
instruments, under which binding agreements were established to ensure formal commitments.
instruments, under which binding agreements were established to ensure formal commitments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-162 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of Law and Society |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 10 Mar 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- 2025 OA procedure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'China’s Belt and Road Initiative is Not a Novel Approach to International Law-Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver