Classroom versus individual working memory assessment: predicting academic achievement and the role of attention and response inhibition

Ilona Friso-van den Bos, Eva van de Weijer-Bergsma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is an important predictor for academic learning and achievement. Typically, children’s WM is assessed in controlled testing situations, which might not reflect functioning in typical classroom learning situations with natural distractions. In this study, we compared WM performance in controlled and classroom situations and their predictive value for academic achievement. Also, we examined whether performance differences between situations were moderated by attention or response inhibition. In a within-subjects design, primary school children completed visuospatial and verbal WM tasks in two settings (classroom versus controlled individual setting). First, WM functioning was lower in the classroom setting. Second, attention moderated individual differences in this discrepancy between settings, but response inhibition did not. Third, classroom obtained verbal WM scores were the strongest predictors of academic achievement. Our results indicate that classroom assessment of verbal WM provides a more ecologically valid measurement of WM abilities in a real-life learning situation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMemory
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 23 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Learning
Aptitude
Inhibition (Psychology)
Academic Achievement
Working Memory
Individuality
Verbal Working Memory
Controlled
Predictors

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • attention
  • classroom assessment
  • response inhibition
  • Working memory
  • academic achievement

Cite this

@article{6df307f2db674a8a95f0b8e856ee3fbb,
title = "Classroom versus individual working memory assessment: predicting academic achievement and the role of attention and response inhibition",
abstract = "Working memory (WM) is an important predictor for academic learning and achievement. Typically, children’s WM is assessed in controlled testing situations, which might not reflect functioning in typical classroom learning situations with natural distractions. In this study, we compared WM performance in controlled and classroom situations and their predictive value for academic achievement. Also, we examined whether performance differences between situations were moderated by attention or response inhibition. In a within-subjects design, primary school children completed visuospatial and verbal WM tasks in two settings (classroom versus controlled individual setting). First, WM functioning was lower in the classroom setting. Second, attention moderated individual differences in this discrepancy between settings, but response inhibition did not. Third, classroom obtained verbal WM scores were the strongest predictors of academic achievement. Our results indicate that classroom assessment of verbal WM provides a more ecologically valid measurement of WM abilities in a real-life learning situation.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, attention, classroom assessment, response inhibition, Working memory, academic achievement",
author = "{Friso-van den Bos}, Ilona and {van de Weijer-Bergsma}, Eva",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2019.1682170",
language = "English",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Classroom versus individual working memory assessment : predicting academic achievement and the role of attention and response inhibition. / Friso-van den Bos, Ilona; van de Weijer-Bergsma, Eva.

In: Memory, 23.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classroom versus individual working memory assessment

T2 - predicting academic achievement and the role of attention and response inhibition

AU - Friso-van den Bos, Ilona

AU - van de Weijer-Bergsma, Eva

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2019/10/23

Y1 - 2019/10/23

N2 - Working memory (WM) is an important predictor for academic learning and achievement. Typically, children’s WM is assessed in controlled testing situations, which might not reflect functioning in typical classroom learning situations with natural distractions. In this study, we compared WM performance in controlled and classroom situations and their predictive value for academic achievement. Also, we examined whether performance differences between situations were moderated by attention or response inhibition. In a within-subjects design, primary school children completed visuospatial and verbal WM tasks in two settings (classroom versus controlled individual setting). First, WM functioning was lower in the classroom setting. Second, attention moderated individual differences in this discrepancy between settings, but response inhibition did not. Third, classroom obtained verbal WM scores were the strongest predictors of academic achievement. Our results indicate that classroom assessment of verbal WM provides a more ecologically valid measurement of WM abilities in a real-life learning situation.

AB - Working memory (WM) is an important predictor for academic learning and achievement. Typically, children’s WM is assessed in controlled testing situations, which might not reflect functioning in typical classroom learning situations with natural distractions. In this study, we compared WM performance in controlled and classroom situations and their predictive value for academic achievement. Also, we examined whether performance differences between situations were moderated by attention or response inhibition. In a within-subjects design, primary school children completed visuospatial and verbal WM tasks in two settings (classroom versus controlled individual setting). First, WM functioning was lower in the classroom setting. Second, attention moderated individual differences in this discrepancy between settings, but response inhibition did not. Third, classroom obtained verbal WM scores were the strongest predictors of academic achievement. Our results indicate that classroom assessment of verbal WM provides a more ecologically valid measurement of WM abilities in a real-life learning situation.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - attention

KW - classroom assessment

KW - response inhibition

KW - Working memory

KW - academic achievement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074510074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2019.1682170

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2019.1682170

M3 - Article

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

ER -