Closing the gap between scholarly knowledge and practice: Guidelines for HRM action research

Inge Bleijenbergh*, Jorrit van Mierlo, Tanya Bondarouk

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper we review the current use of action research in the field of Human Resource Management (HRM), and assess its potential contribution to the field. We show that action research is very suitable for theory development and excels in developing scholarly knowledge that informs practitioners and is relevant for specific contexts. Although only a handful of HRM papers label their research as action research (from our review of nine journals between 2000 and 2019), they substantially contribute to HRM by explaining the role of context and the dynamic nature of HRM design, implementation and evaluation and by showing the effectiveness of systemic interventions. We offer guidelines for conducting HRM action research projects, emphasizing the importance of involving relevant stakeholders, rigorously making field notes of the research process and reflexivity on the interests of both researchers and practitioners.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number100764
    JournalHuman resource management review
    Volume31
    Issue number2
    Early online date31 Mar 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2021

    Keywords

    • Guidelines
    • Practice
    • Stakeholder involvement
    • Theory development
    • Action research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Closing the gap between scholarly knowledge and practice: Guidelines for HRM action research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this