Co-production and participation: two magic words?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Consequences of co-production – In this era of growing challenges and shrinking budgets, governments are tempted to redefine some of their responsibilities. Fortunately for these institutions, the call for more public participation is answered by societal actors such as citizens, companies and societal organisations aspiring to step in. Co-production occurs, when governments work together with societal actors to find policy solutions. The final decision-making authority in such cases is still with the governments, but they are committed to the solutions developed with the societal actors. However, within these co-production processes, either governments or societal actors can be in the lead. Starting from the assumption that governmental institutions and societal actors have different interests and drivers, this article explores the consequences of societal actors taking the initiative in terms of involved actors, interaction and cooperation. In this contribution, we elaborate some of the consequences of such a shift in governance by examining a societal initiative resulting in a pilot at the Houtribdijk. This pilot investigates sandy strategies in low energy water systems for their potential for flood protection. This pilot is in contrast with the government led dike reinforcement project at the Houtribdijk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)-
JournalWater governance
Volume4
Issue number5-6
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

coproduction
participation
production process
reinforcement
natural disaster
budget
driver
governance
citizen
energy
decision making
water
responsibility
interaction

Keywords

  • IR-93692
  • METIS-308160

Cite this

@article{da15287d87bd48bd969396462ae0a82f,
title = "Co-production and participation: two magic words?",
abstract = "Consequences of co-production – In this era of growing challenges and shrinking budgets, governments are tempted to redefine some of their responsibilities. Fortunately for these institutions, the call for more public participation is answered by societal actors such as citizens, companies and societal organisations aspiring to step in. Co-production occurs, when governments work together with societal actors to find policy solutions. The final decision-making authority in such cases is still with the governments, but they are committed to the solutions developed with the societal actors. However, within these co-production processes, either governments or societal actors can be in the lead. Starting from the assumption that governmental institutions and societal actors have different interests and drivers, this article explores the consequences of societal actors taking the initiative in terms of involved actors, interaction and cooperation. In this contribution, we elaborate some of the consequences of such a shift in governance by examining a societal initiative resulting in a pilot at the Houtribdijk. This pilot investigates sandy strategies in low energy water systems for their potential for flood protection. This pilot is in contrast with the government led dike reinforcement project at the Houtribdijk.",
keywords = "IR-93692, METIS-308160",
author = "Aukes, {Ewert Johannes} and Lulofs, {Kristiaan R.D.}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "--",
journal = "Water governance",
issn = "2211-0224",
publisher = "Baltzer AG",
number = "5-6",

}

Co-production and participation: two magic words? / Aukes, Ewert Johannes; Lulofs, Kristiaan R.D.

In: Water governance, Vol. 4, No. 5-6, 2014, p. -.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-production and participation: two magic words?

AU - Aukes, Ewert Johannes

AU - Lulofs, Kristiaan R.D.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Consequences of co-production – In this era of growing challenges and shrinking budgets, governments are tempted to redefine some of their responsibilities. Fortunately for these institutions, the call for more public participation is answered by societal actors such as citizens, companies and societal organisations aspiring to step in. Co-production occurs, when governments work together with societal actors to find policy solutions. The final decision-making authority in such cases is still with the governments, but they are committed to the solutions developed with the societal actors. However, within these co-production processes, either governments or societal actors can be in the lead. Starting from the assumption that governmental institutions and societal actors have different interests and drivers, this article explores the consequences of societal actors taking the initiative in terms of involved actors, interaction and cooperation. In this contribution, we elaborate some of the consequences of such a shift in governance by examining a societal initiative resulting in a pilot at the Houtribdijk. This pilot investigates sandy strategies in low energy water systems for their potential for flood protection. This pilot is in contrast with the government led dike reinforcement project at the Houtribdijk.

AB - Consequences of co-production – In this era of growing challenges and shrinking budgets, governments are tempted to redefine some of their responsibilities. Fortunately for these institutions, the call for more public participation is answered by societal actors such as citizens, companies and societal organisations aspiring to step in. Co-production occurs, when governments work together with societal actors to find policy solutions. The final decision-making authority in such cases is still with the governments, but they are committed to the solutions developed with the societal actors. However, within these co-production processes, either governments or societal actors can be in the lead. Starting from the assumption that governmental institutions and societal actors have different interests and drivers, this article explores the consequences of societal actors taking the initiative in terms of involved actors, interaction and cooperation. In this contribution, we elaborate some of the consequences of such a shift in governance by examining a societal initiative resulting in a pilot at the Houtribdijk. This pilot investigates sandy strategies in low energy water systems for their potential for flood protection. This pilot is in contrast with the government led dike reinforcement project at the Houtribdijk.

KW - IR-93692

KW - METIS-308160

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - -

JO - Water governance

JF - Water governance

SN - 2211-0224

IS - 5-6

ER -