Collaborative design as a form of professional development

Joke Voogt*, Therese Laferrière, Alain Breuleux, Rebecca C. Itow, Daniel T. Hickey, Susan McKenney

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

188 Citations (Scopus)
302 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Increasingly, teacher involvement in collaborative design of curriculum is viewed as a form of professional development. However, the research base for this stance is limited. While it is assumed that the activities teachers undertake during collaborative design of curricular materials can be beneficial for teacher learning, only a few studies involving such efforts exist. Additionally many lack specific theoretical frameworks for robust investigation of teacher learning by design. The situative perspective articulated by Greeno et al. (1998) and third-generation activity theory as developed by Engeström (1987) constitute useful conceptual frameworks to describe and investigate teacher learning by collaborative design. In this contribution, three key features derived from these two theories, situatedness, agency and the cyclical nature of learning and change, are used to describe three cases of collaborative design in three different settings. Grounded on this theoretical basis and a synthesis of the three case descriptions, we propose an empirically and theoretically informed agenda for studying teacher learning by collaborative design.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-282
Number of pages24
JournalInstructional science
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • Activity theory
  • Cases
  • Collaborative design
  • Situated learning
  • Teacher learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collaborative design as a form of professional development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this