12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Collaboration is increasingly seen as an important aspect of successful water management, and yet it remains insufficiently understood. This paper examines how collaboration is influenced by the governance system that guides and organizes the related actions and interactions. Building upon an existing governance assessment tool, this paper provides the basis for predicting how supportive (or restrictive) a governance system will be towards collaboration, according to eight different governance system classes. The validity of this framework is reflected upon in case studies from five countries: Mexico, the Netherlands, Canada, Romania and Turkey. The collaborative processes in Mexico, Romania and Turkey are embedded in restrictive governance systems and show low levels of collaboration. The governance system in the Canadian case is assessed as neutral and shows a medium level of collaboration, whereas the governance system in the Netherlands shows high levels of collaboration and is assessed as supportive. The results are encouraging, as the case studies demonstrate the predicted influences of a governance system on collaboration. Yet, the case studies also highlight the potential importance of characteristics of the collaborative process and collaborating actors. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-241
JournalEnvironmental policy and governance
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

water management
governance
water
management
resources
Romania
Turkey
Netherlands
Mexico
water resources management
Canada
interaction

Keywords

  • METIS-321268
  • IR-103218

Cite this

@article{f64df2626706428e80cabfa2f2b772f5,
title = "Collaborative Water Resource Management: What makes up a supportive governance system?",
abstract = "Collaboration is increasingly seen as an important aspect of successful water management, and yet it remains insufficiently understood. This paper examines how collaboration is influenced by the governance system that guides and organizes the related actions and interactions. Building upon an existing governance assessment tool, this paper provides the basis for predicting how supportive (or restrictive) a governance system will be towards collaboration, according to eight different governance system classes. The validity of this framework is reflected upon in case studies from five countries: Mexico, the Netherlands, Canada, Romania and Turkey. The collaborative processes in Mexico, Romania and Turkey are embedded in restrictive governance systems and show low levels of collaboration. The governance system in the Canadian case is assessed as neutral and shows a medium level of collaboration, whereas the governance system in the Netherlands shows high levels of collaboration and is assessed as supportive. The results are encouraging, as the case studies demonstrate the predicted influences of a governance system on collaboration. Yet, the case studies also highlight the potential importance of characteristics of the collaborative process and collaborating actors. Copyright {\circledC} 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment",
keywords = "METIS-321268, IR-103218",
author = "C.L. Boer and {Vinke-de Kruijf}, Joanne and G{\"u}l {\"O}zerol and Bressers, {Johannes T.A.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/eet.1714",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "229--241",
journal = "Environmental policy and governance",
issn = "1756-932X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaborative Water Resource Management: What makes up a supportive governance system?

AU - Boer, C.L.

AU - Vinke-de Kruijf, Joanne

AU - Özerol, Gül

AU - Bressers, Johannes T.A.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Collaboration is increasingly seen as an important aspect of successful water management, and yet it remains insufficiently understood. This paper examines how collaboration is influenced by the governance system that guides and organizes the related actions and interactions. Building upon an existing governance assessment tool, this paper provides the basis for predicting how supportive (or restrictive) a governance system will be towards collaboration, according to eight different governance system classes. The validity of this framework is reflected upon in case studies from five countries: Mexico, the Netherlands, Canada, Romania and Turkey. The collaborative processes in Mexico, Romania and Turkey are embedded in restrictive governance systems and show low levels of collaboration. The governance system in the Canadian case is assessed as neutral and shows a medium level of collaboration, whereas the governance system in the Netherlands shows high levels of collaboration and is assessed as supportive. The results are encouraging, as the case studies demonstrate the predicted influences of a governance system on collaboration. Yet, the case studies also highlight the potential importance of characteristics of the collaborative process and collaborating actors. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

AB - Collaboration is increasingly seen as an important aspect of successful water management, and yet it remains insufficiently understood. This paper examines how collaboration is influenced by the governance system that guides and organizes the related actions and interactions. Building upon an existing governance assessment tool, this paper provides the basis for predicting how supportive (or restrictive) a governance system will be towards collaboration, according to eight different governance system classes. The validity of this framework is reflected upon in case studies from five countries: Mexico, the Netherlands, Canada, Romania and Turkey. The collaborative processes in Mexico, Romania and Turkey are embedded in restrictive governance systems and show low levels of collaboration. The governance system in the Canadian case is assessed as neutral and shows a medium level of collaboration, whereas the governance system in the Netherlands shows high levels of collaboration and is assessed as supportive. The results are encouraging, as the case studies demonstrate the predicted influences of a governance system on collaboration. Yet, the case studies also highlight the potential importance of characteristics of the collaborative process and collaborating actors. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

KW - METIS-321268

KW - IR-103218

U2 - 10.1002/eet.1714

DO - 10.1002/eet.1714

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 229

EP - 241

JO - Environmental policy and governance

JF - Environmental policy and governance

SN - 1756-932X

IS - 4

ER -