Comparing Ucn with Fddi and Dqdb Using a Realistic Workload Model

H.L. Pasch; I.G.M.M. Niemegeers

doi:10.1109/IWACA.1992.639829

Comparing Ucn with Fddi and Dqdb Using a Realistic Workload Model

H.L. Pasch, I.G.M.M. Niemegeers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

211 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The token ring FDDI and the slotted bus DQDB are the two currently most important standards for high speed networks. Each of these networks has its own specific advantages and disadvantages, and its own specific type of load for which it petforms best. We propose a new network design, called Universal Channel Network (UCN). UCN is adaptive and can be made to behave either like a token ring, a slotted ring, or anything in between. The aim is to get a network that combines the advantages of both the token ring and the slotted ring. In this paper UCN is explained and its pelformance is compared with that of DQDB and FDDI. The workload model used is a detailed representation of today's traffic, extrapolated into the future.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992
Place of Publication	Piscataway, NJ
Publisher	IEEE
Pages	299-308
Number of pages	0
ISBN (Print)	0-7803-0764-X
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/IWACA.1992.639829
Publication status	Published - 19 Mar 1992
Event	International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992 - Munich, Germany Duration: 16 Mar 1992 → 19 Mar 1992

Workshop

Workshop	International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992
Country/Territory	Germany
City	Munich
Period	16/03/92 → 19/03/92

Keywords

IR-18960
METIS-119482

Access to Document

10.1109/IWACA.1992.639829

Pasch1992comparingFinal published version, 974 KB

Cite this

@inproceedings{4ebf029e67b14574a8e5d64b8c9d724d,

title = "Comparing Ucn with Fddi and Dqdb Using a Realistic Workload Model",

abstract = "The token ring FDDI and the slotted bus DQDB are the two currently most important standards for high speed networks. Each of these networks has its own specific advantages and disadvantages, and its own specific type of load for which it petforms best. We propose a new network design, called Universal Channel Network (UCN). UCN is adaptive and can be made to behave either like a token ring, a slotted ring, or anything in between. The aim is to get a network that combines the advantages of both the token ring and the slotted ring. In this paper UCN is explained and its pelformance is compared with that of DQDB and FDDI. The workload model used is a detailed representation of today's traffic, extrapolated into the future.",

keywords = "IR-18960, METIS-119482",

author = "H.L. Pasch and I.G.M.M. Niemegeers",

year = "1992",

month = mar,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1109/IWACA.1992.639829",

language = "English",

isbn = "0-7803-0764-X",

pages = "299--308",

booktitle = "Proceedings International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992",

publisher = "IEEE",

address = "United States",

note = "International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992 ; Conference date: 16-03-1992 Through 19-03-1992",

}

Pasch, HL & Niemegeers, IGMM 1992, Comparing Ucn with Fddi and Dqdb Using a Realistic Workload Model. in Proceedings International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 299-308, International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992, Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 16/03/92. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWACA.1992.639829

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing Ucn with Fddi and Dqdb Using a Realistic Workload Model

AU - Pasch, H.L.

AU - Niemegeers, I.G.M.M.

PY - 1992/3/19

Y1 - 1992/3/19

N2 - The token ring FDDI and the slotted bus DQDB are the two currently most important standards for high speed networks. Each of these networks has its own specific advantages and disadvantages, and its own specific type of load for which it petforms best. We propose a new network design, called Universal Channel Network (UCN). UCN is adaptive and can be made to behave either like a token ring, a slotted ring, or anything in between. The aim is to get a network that combines the advantages of both the token ring and the slotted ring. In this paper UCN is explained and its pelformance is compared with that of DQDB and FDDI. The workload model used is a detailed representation of today's traffic, extrapolated into the future.

AB - The token ring FDDI and the slotted bus DQDB are the two currently most important standards for high speed networks. Each of these networks has its own specific advantages and disadvantages, and its own specific type of load for which it petforms best. We propose a new network design, called Universal Channel Network (UCN). UCN is adaptive and can be made to behave either like a token ring, a slotted ring, or anything in between. The aim is to get a network that combines the advantages of both the token ring and the slotted ring. In this paper UCN is explained and its pelformance is compared with that of DQDB and FDDI. The workload model used is a detailed representation of today's traffic, extrapolated into the future.

KW - IR-18960

KW - METIS-119482

U2 - 10.1109/IWACA.1992.639829

DO - 10.1109/IWACA.1992.639829

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0-7803-0764-X

SP - 299

EP - 308

BT - Proceedings International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992

PB - IEEE

CY - Piscataway, NJ

T2 - International Workshop on Advanced Communications and Applications for High Speed Networks 1992

Y2 - 16 March 1992 through 19 March 1992

ER -

Comparing Ucn with Fddi and Dqdb Using a Realistic Workload Model

Abstract

Workshop

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this