Comparison of Electronic Component Durability Under Uniaxial and Multiaxial Random Vibrations

Matthew Ernst, Ed Mansour Habtour*, Abhijit Dasgupta, Michael F. Pohland, Mark Robeson, Mark Paulus

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Multiaxial and uniaxial vibration experiments were conducted in order to study the differences in failure modes and fatigue life for the two types of excitation. An electrodynamic (ED) shaker capable of controlled vibration in six degrees of freedom (DOF) was employed for the experiments. The test specimen consisted of six large inductors insertion mounted on a printed wiring board (PWB). Average damage accumulation rate (DAR) in the inductor leads was measured for random excitations in-plane, out-of-plane, and both directions simultaneously. Under simultaneous multiaxial excitation, the average DAR was found to be 2.2 times greater than the sum of the in-plane and out-of-plane DARs. The conclusion was that multiple-step sequential uniaxial testing may significantly overestimate the durability of large/heavy structures with high center of mass in a multiaxial dynamic environment. Additionally, a test method utilizing uniaxial vibration along a direction other than the principal directions of the structure was examined. This method was found to have significant limitations, but showed better agreement with simultaneous multiaxial vibration experiments.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number011009
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Electronic Packaging, Transactions of the ASME
    Volume137
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • Multiaxial
    • Vibration
    • Nonlinear dynamics
    • Fatigue
    • electronics packaging
    • Reliability

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Electronic Component Durability Under Uniaxial and Multiaxial Random Vibrations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this