Comparison of log-periodic, dual-stacked log-periodic, and horn antenna on the field uniformity and power efficiency from 80 MHz to 1 GHz

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    A Comparison of 4 different types of antennas, - a biconical (dipole like-type) antenna, a single log periodic dipole antenna (LPDA), a dual-stacked log periodic antenna (dual-stacked LPDA, HL043E) and Extended-Double Ridge Guide (Ext-DRG) Horn antenna has been performed. The aims are to obtain an analysis of the homogeneity of the field as well as the required power, i.e, the efficiency. For all measurements the same test setup, according to IEC 61000-4-3 at 3 m distance, has been used. The result show that field uniformities from-Dual-stacked LPDA antenna and Ext-DRG Horn antenna are very good, comparable and much below the limit, while single LPDA has lower uniformity. Regarding to the forward power injected to the antennas, the Ext-DRG Horn antenna is the most efficient antenna compared to the other antennas.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication2017 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility
    Subtitle of host publicationAPEMC
    Place of PublicationUSA
    PublisherIEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Society
    Pages127-130
    Number of pages4
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-5386-3912-2
    ISBN (Print)978-1-5386-3913-9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2017

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of log-periodic, dual-stacked log-periodic, and horn antenna on the field uniformity and power efficiency from 80 MHz to 1 GHz'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Mandaris, D., Moonen, D. J. G., Schuurmans, J., & Leferink, F. (2017). Comparison of log-periodic, dual-stacked log-periodic, and horn antenna on the field uniformity and power efficiency from 80 MHz to 1 GHz. In 2017 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility: APEMC (pp. 127-130). [17027924] USA: IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEMC.2017.7975443