Comparison of Poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) and Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Membranes for Urethral Regeneration: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study

Reetta Sartoneva (Corresponding Author), Panu H. Nordback, Suvi Haimi, Dirk W. Grijpma, Kalle Lehto, Niall Rooney, Riitta Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, Susanna Miettinen, Tuija Lahdes-Vasama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urethral defects are normally reconstructed using a patient's own genital tissue; however, in severe cases, additional grafts are needed. We studied the suitability of poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) (PLCL) and poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) membranes for urethral reconstruction in vivo. Further, the compatibility of the materials was evaluated in vitro with human urothelial cells (hUCs). The attachment and viability of hUCs and the expression of different urothelial cell markers (cytokeratin 7, 8, 19, and uroplakin Ia, Ib, and III) were studied after in vitro cell culture on PLCL and PTMC. For the in vivo study, 32 rabbits were divided into the PLCL (n = 15), PTMC (n = 15), and control or sham surgery (n = 2) groups. An oval urethral defect 1 × 2 cm in size was surgically excised and replaced with a PLCL or a PTMC membrane or urethral mucosa in sham surgery group. The rabbits were followed for 2, 4, and 16 weeks. After the follow-up, urethrography was performed to check the patency of the urethra. The defect area was excised for histological examination, where the epithelial integrity and structure, inflammation, and fibrosis were observed. There was no notable difference on hUCs attachment on PLCL and PTMC membranes after 1 day of cell seeding, further, the majority of hUCs were viable and maintained their urothelial phenotype on both biomaterials. Postoperatively, animals recovered well, and no severe strictures were discovered by urethrography. In histological examination, the urothelial integrity and structure developed toward a normal urothelium with only mild signs of fibrosis or inflammation. According to these results, PLCL and PTMC are both suitable for reconstructing urethral defects. There were no explicit differences between the PLCL and PTMC membranes. However, PTMC membranes were more flexible, easier to suture and shape, and developed significant epithelial integrity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-127
Number of pages11
JournalTissue Engineering - Part A
Volume24
Issue number1-2
Early online date21 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Regeneration
Carbonates
Membranes
Defects
Uroplakin Ib
Uroplakin Ia
Surgery
Uroplakin III
Fibrosis
Keratin-8
Keratin-7
Rabbits
Inflammation
Urothelium
In Vitro Techniques
poly(lactide)
caprolactone
polytrimethylene carbonate
dilactide
Biocompatible Materials

Keywords

  • Poly(l-lactide-co-e-caprolactone)
  • poly(trimethylene carbonate)
  • urethral defects
  • urethral tissue engineering
  • urothelial cell

Cite this

Sartoneva, Reetta ; Nordback, Panu H. ; Haimi, Suvi ; Grijpma, Dirk W. ; Lehto, Kalle ; Rooney, Niall ; Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, Riitta ; Miettinen, Susanna ; Lahdes-Vasama, Tuija. / Comparison of Poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) and Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Membranes for Urethral Regeneration : An in Vitro and in Vivo Study. In: Tissue Engineering - Part A. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 1-2. pp. 117-127.
@article{07423033bbdf4fedb40dbb35d4989178,
title = "Comparison of Poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) and Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Membranes for Urethral Regeneration: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study",
abstract = "Urethral defects are normally reconstructed using a patient's own genital tissue; however, in severe cases, additional grafts are needed. We studied the suitability of poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) (PLCL) and poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) membranes for urethral reconstruction in vivo. Further, the compatibility of the materials was evaluated in vitro with human urothelial cells (hUCs). The attachment and viability of hUCs and the expression of different urothelial cell markers (cytokeratin 7, 8, 19, and uroplakin Ia, Ib, and III) were studied after in vitro cell culture on PLCL and PTMC. For the in vivo study, 32 rabbits were divided into the PLCL (n = 15), PTMC (n = 15), and control or sham surgery (n = 2) groups. An oval urethral defect 1 × 2 cm in size was surgically excised and replaced with a PLCL or a PTMC membrane or urethral mucosa in sham surgery group. The rabbits were followed for 2, 4, and 16 weeks. After the follow-up, urethrography was performed to check the patency of the urethra. The defect area was excised for histological examination, where the epithelial integrity and structure, inflammation, and fibrosis were observed. There was no notable difference on hUCs attachment on PLCL and PTMC membranes after 1 day of cell seeding, further, the majority of hUCs were viable and maintained their urothelial phenotype on both biomaterials. Postoperatively, animals recovered well, and no severe strictures were discovered by urethrography. In histological examination, the urothelial integrity and structure developed toward a normal urothelium with only mild signs of fibrosis or inflammation. According to these results, PLCL and PTMC are both suitable for reconstructing urethral defects. There were no explicit differences between the PLCL and PTMC membranes. However, PTMC membranes were more flexible, easier to suture and shape, and developed significant epithelial integrity.",
keywords = "Poly(l-lactide-co-e-caprolactone), poly(trimethylene carbonate), urethral defects, urethral tissue engineering, urothelial cell",
author = "Reetta Sartoneva and Nordback, {Panu H.} and Suvi Haimi and Grijpma, {Dirk W.} and Kalle Lehto and Niall Rooney and Riitta Sepp{\"a}nen-Kaijansinkko and Susanna Miettinen and Tuija Lahdes-Vasama",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0245",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "117--127",
journal = "Tissue engineering. Part A",
issn = "1937-3341",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1-2",

}

Sartoneva, R, Nordback, PH, Haimi, S, Grijpma, DW, Lehto, K, Rooney, N, Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, R, Miettinen, S & Lahdes-Vasama, T 2018, 'Comparison of Poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) and Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Membranes for Urethral Regeneration: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study' Tissue Engineering - Part A, vol. 24, no. 1-2, pp. 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0245

Comparison of Poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) and Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Membranes for Urethral Regeneration : An in Vitro and in Vivo Study. / Sartoneva, Reetta (Corresponding Author); Nordback, Panu H.; Haimi, Suvi; Grijpma, Dirk W.; Lehto, Kalle; Rooney, Niall; Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, Riitta; Miettinen, Susanna; Lahdes-Vasama, Tuija.

In: Tissue Engineering - Part A, Vol. 24, No. 1-2, 01.01.2018, p. 117-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) and Poly(trimethylene carbonate) Membranes for Urethral Regeneration

T2 - An in Vitro and in Vivo Study

AU - Sartoneva, Reetta

AU - Nordback, Panu H.

AU - Haimi, Suvi

AU - Grijpma, Dirk W.

AU - Lehto, Kalle

AU - Rooney, Niall

AU - Seppänen-Kaijansinkko, Riitta

AU - Miettinen, Susanna

AU - Lahdes-Vasama, Tuija

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Urethral defects are normally reconstructed using a patient's own genital tissue; however, in severe cases, additional grafts are needed. We studied the suitability of poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) (PLCL) and poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) membranes for urethral reconstruction in vivo. Further, the compatibility of the materials was evaluated in vitro with human urothelial cells (hUCs). The attachment and viability of hUCs and the expression of different urothelial cell markers (cytokeratin 7, 8, 19, and uroplakin Ia, Ib, and III) were studied after in vitro cell culture on PLCL and PTMC. For the in vivo study, 32 rabbits were divided into the PLCL (n = 15), PTMC (n = 15), and control or sham surgery (n = 2) groups. An oval urethral defect 1 × 2 cm in size was surgically excised and replaced with a PLCL or a PTMC membrane or urethral mucosa in sham surgery group. The rabbits were followed for 2, 4, and 16 weeks. After the follow-up, urethrography was performed to check the patency of the urethra. The defect area was excised for histological examination, where the epithelial integrity and structure, inflammation, and fibrosis were observed. There was no notable difference on hUCs attachment on PLCL and PTMC membranes after 1 day of cell seeding, further, the majority of hUCs were viable and maintained their urothelial phenotype on both biomaterials. Postoperatively, animals recovered well, and no severe strictures were discovered by urethrography. In histological examination, the urothelial integrity and structure developed toward a normal urothelium with only mild signs of fibrosis or inflammation. According to these results, PLCL and PTMC are both suitable for reconstructing urethral defects. There were no explicit differences between the PLCL and PTMC membranes. However, PTMC membranes were more flexible, easier to suture and shape, and developed significant epithelial integrity.

AB - Urethral defects are normally reconstructed using a patient's own genital tissue; however, in severe cases, additional grafts are needed. We studied the suitability of poly(l-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) (PLCL) and poly(trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) membranes for urethral reconstruction in vivo. Further, the compatibility of the materials was evaluated in vitro with human urothelial cells (hUCs). The attachment and viability of hUCs and the expression of different urothelial cell markers (cytokeratin 7, 8, 19, and uroplakin Ia, Ib, and III) were studied after in vitro cell culture on PLCL and PTMC. For the in vivo study, 32 rabbits were divided into the PLCL (n = 15), PTMC (n = 15), and control or sham surgery (n = 2) groups. An oval urethral defect 1 × 2 cm in size was surgically excised and replaced with a PLCL or a PTMC membrane or urethral mucosa in sham surgery group. The rabbits were followed for 2, 4, and 16 weeks. After the follow-up, urethrography was performed to check the patency of the urethra. The defect area was excised for histological examination, where the epithelial integrity and structure, inflammation, and fibrosis were observed. There was no notable difference on hUCs attachment on PLCL and PTMC membranes after 1 day of cell seeding, further, the majority of hUCs were viable and maintained their urothelial phenotype on both biomaterials. Postoperatively, animals recovered well, and no severe strictures were discovered by urethrography. In histological examination, the urothelial integrity and structure developed toward a normal urothelium with only mild signs of fibrosis or inflammation. According to these results, PLCL and PTMC are both suitable for reconstructing urethral defects. There were no explicit differences between the PLCL and PTMC membranes. However, PTMC membranes were more flexible, easier to suture and shape, and developed significant epithelial integrity.

KW - Poly(l-lactide-co-e-caprolactone)

KW - poly(trimethylene carbonate)

KW - urethral defects

KW - urethral tissue engineering

KW - urothelial cell

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040541016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0245

DO - 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0245

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 117

EP - 127

JO - Tissue engineering. Part A

JF - Tissue engineering. Part A

SN - 1937-3341

IS - 1-2

ER -