TY - JOUR
T1 - Comprehensive evaluation of machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping in Wardha River sub-basin, India
AU - Sharma, Asheesh
AU - Nerkar, Sudhanshu
AU - Banyal, Rishit
AU - Poonia, Mandeep
AU - Kadaverugu, Rakesh
AU - Damahe, Lalit
AU - Tügel, Franziska
AU - Holzbecher, Ekkehard
AU - Hinkelmann, Reinhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Machine learning offers a powerful and versatile approach to flood susceptibility mapping, enabling us to leverage complex data and improve prediction accuracy. Given the plethora of available techniques and the challenges in selecting the optimal approach, this study investigates prominent ML algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping (FSM) in the Wardha River sub-basin, India. Seven machine learning algorithms, viz. support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), artificial neural network (ANN), generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), were evaluated at varying spatial resolutions (30 m, 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m). Seven flood-inducing factors (elevation, flow accumulation, topographic wetness index, slope, rainfall, land use, and drain density) were considered. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), overall correlation, overall standard deviation ratio, and overall root mean square difference (RMSD). The impact of spatial resolution on models’ accuracy was analysed. SVM, GBM, and RF were significantly affected, while ANN, GLM, and XGB were less sensitive. LDA excelled in execution time and spatial resolution resilience. The overall ranking of models was executed based on their accuracy, AUC, and execution time. XGB outperformed GBM and RF, securing first place, while SVM ranked last. GLM, ANN, and LDA ranked third to fifth. The results highlighted the importance of algorithm selection in accurately mapping flood susceptibility, particularly when working with varying spatial resolution data. The study findings can inform the decision-making process for implementing FSM using these machine learning algorithms.
AB - Machine learning offers a powerful and versatile approach to flood susceptibility mapping, enabling us to leverage complex data and improve prediction accuracy. Given the plethora of available techniques and the challenges in selecting the optimal approach, this study investigates prominent ML algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping (FSM) in the Wardha River sub-basin, India. Seven machine learning algorithms, viz. support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), artificial neural network (ANN), generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), were evaluated at varying spatial resolutions (30 m, 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m). Seven flood-inducing factors (elevation, flow accumulation, topographic wetness index, slope, rainfall, land use, and drain density) were considered. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), overall correlation, overall standard deviation ratio, and overall root mean square difference (RMSD). The impact of spatial resolution on models’ accuracy was analysed. SVM, GBM, and RF were significantly affected, while ANN, GLM, and XGB were less sensitive. LDA excelled in execution time and spatial resolution resilience. The overall ranking of models was executed based on their accuracy, AUC, and execution time. XGB outperformed GBM and RF, securing first place, while SVM ranked last. GLM, ANN, and LDA ranked third to fifth. The results highlighted the importance of algorithm selection in accurately mapping flood susceptibility, particularly when working with varying spatial resolution data. The study findings can inform the decision-making process for implementing FSM using these machine learning algorithms.
KW - 2025 OA procedure
KW - Flood susceptibility mapping
KW - Flood-contributing factor
KW - Machine learning algorithms
KW - Spatial resolution
KW - Execution time
KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
U2 - 10.1007/s11600-024-01471-8
DO - 10.1007/s11600-024-01471-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85211440191
SN - 1895-6572
JO - Acta geophysica
JF - Acta geophysica
ER -