Comprehensive evaluation of machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping in Wardha River sub-basin, India

Asheesh Sharma*, Sudhanshu Nerkar, Rishit Banyal, Mandeep Poonia, Rakesh Kadaverugu, Lalit Damahe, Franziska Tügel, Ekkehard Holzbecher, Reinhard Hinkelmann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Machine learning offers a powerful and versatile approach to flood susceptibility mapping, enabling us to leverage complex data and improve prediction accuracy. Given the plethora of available techniques and the challenges in selecting the optimal approach, this study investigates prominent ML algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping (FSM) in the Wardha River sub-basin, India. Seven machine learning algorithms, viz. support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), artificial neural network (ANN), generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), were evaluated at varying spatial resolutions (30 m, 50 m, 100 m, and 200 m). Seven flood-inducing factors (elevation, flow accumulation, topographic wetness index, slope, rainfall, land use, and drain density) were considered. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), overall correlation, overall standard deviation ratio, and overall root mean square difference (RMSD). The impact of spatial resolution on models’ accuracy was analysed. SVM, GBM, and RF were significantly affected, while ANN, GLM, and XGB were less sensitive. LDA excelled in execution time and spatial resolution resilience. The overall ranking of models was executed based on their accuracy, AUC, and execution time. XGB outperformed GBM and RF, securing first place, while SVM ranked last. GLM, ANN, and LDA ranked third to fifth. The results highlighted the importance of algorithm selection in accurately mapping flood susceptibility, particularly when working with varying spatial resolution data. The study findings can inform the decision-making process for implementing FSM using these machine learning algorithms.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalActa geophysica
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 2024

Keywords

  • 2025 OA procedure
  • Flood susceptibility mapping
  • Flood-contributing factor
  • Machine learning algorithms
  • Spatial resolution
  • Execution time
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehensive evaluation of machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility mapping in Wardha River sub-basin, India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this