Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method

Research output: Book/ReportReportAcademic

205 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although there have been many attempts to define the concept `computer literacy', no consensus has been reached: many variations of the concept exist within literature. The majority of papers does not explicitly define the concept at all, instead using an unjustified subset of elements related to computers to assess a subject's level of computer literacy. This can limit the generalizability of research and can lead to fallacious conclusions. This is an internal report listing the method by which the research was conducted.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCentre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2017

Publication series

NameCTIT Technical Report Series
PublisherUniversity of Twente, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)
No.TR-CTIT-17-05
ISSN (Print)1381-3625

Fingerprint

literacy
literature

Keywords

  • Computer Literacy
  • Computer Skills
  • Digital Literacy
  • Systematic Literature Review
  • Questionnaire development

Cite this

Kegel, R. HP., Barth, S., Klaassen, R., & Wieringa, R. J. (2017). Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method. (CTIT Technical Report Series; No. TR-CTIT-17-05). Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT).
Kegel, Roeland Hendrik,Pieter ; Barth, Susanne ; Klaassen, Randy ; Wieringa, Roelf J. / Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), 2017. 4 p. (CTIT Technical Report Series; TR-CTIT-17-05).
@book{0505ad8150a847acbf3879b09d5d4d8e,
title = "Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method",
abstract = "Although there have been many attempts to define the concept `computer literacy', no consensus has been reached: many variations of the concept exist within literature. The majority of papers does not explicitly define the concept at all, instead using an unjustified subset of elements related to computers to assess a subject's level of computer literacy. This can limit the generalizability of research and can lead to fallacious conclusions. This is an internal report listing the method by which the research was conducted.",
keywords = "Computer Literacy, Computer Skills, Digital Literacy, Systematic Literature Review, Questionnaire development",
author = "Kegel, {Roeland Hendrik,Pieter} and Susanne Barth and Randy Klaassen and Wieringa, {Roelf J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "19",
language = "English",
series = "CTIT Technical Report Series",
publisher = "Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)",
number = "TR-CTIT-17-05",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Kegel, RHP, Barth, S, Klaassen, R & Wieringa, RJ 2017, Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method. CTIT Technical Report Series, no. TR-CTIT-17-05, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT).

Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method. / Kegel, Roeland Hendrik,Pieter; Barth, Susanne ; Klaassen, Randy ; Wieringa, Roelf J.

Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), 2017. 4 p. (CTIT Technical Report Series; No. TR-CTIT-17-05).

Research output: Book/ReportReportAcademic

TY - BOOK

T1 - Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method

AU - Kegel, Roeland Hendrik,Pieter

AU - Barth, Susanne

AU - Klaassen, Randy

AU - Wieringa, Roelf J.

PY - 2017/6/19

Y1 - 2017/6/19

N2 - Although there have been many attempts to define the concept `computer literacy', no consensus has been reached: many variations of the concept exist within literature. The majority of papers does not explicitly define the concept at all, instead using an unjustified subset of elements related to computers to assess a subject's level of computer literacy. This can limit the generalizability of research and can lead to fallacious conclusions. This is an internal report listing the method by which the research was conducted.

AB - Although there have been many attempts to define the concept `computer literacy', no consensus has been reached: many variations of the concept exist within literature. The majority of papers does not explicitly define the concept at all, instead using an unjustified subset of elements related to computers to assess a subject's level of computer literacy. This can limit the generalizability of research and can lead to fallacious conclusions. This is an internal report listing the method by which the research was conducted.

KW - Computer Literacy

KW - Computer Skills

KW - Digital Literacy

KW - Systematic Literature Review

KW - Questionnaire development

M3 - Report

T3 - CTIT Technical Report Series

BT - Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method

PB - Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT)

ER -

Kegel RHP, Barth S, Klaassen R, Wieringa RJ. Computer Literacy Systematic Literature Review Method. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (CTIT), 2017. 4 p. (CTIT Technical Report Series; TR-CTIT-17-05).