Computerized crime linkage systems: a critical review and research agenda

C. Bennell, B. Snook, S. MacDonald, J. C. House, Paul J Taylor

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Computerized crime linkage systems are meant to assist the police in determining whether crimes have been committed by the same offender. In this article, the authors assess these systems critically and identify four assumptions that affect the effectiveness of these systems. These assumptions are that (a) data in the systems can be coded reliably, (b) data in the systems are accurate, (c) violent serial offenders exhibit consistent but distinctive patterns of behavior, and (d) analysts have the ability to use the data in the systems to link crimes accurately. The authors argue that there is no compelling empirical support for any of the four assumptions, and they outline a research agenda for testing each assumption. Until evidence supporting these assumptions becomes available, the value of linkage systems will remain open to debate.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)620-634
    JournalCriminal justice and behavior
    Volume39
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • IR-82423
    • METIS-290261

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Computerized crime linkage systems: a critical review and research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this