Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: valuation languages and power asymmetries in the roundtable on sustainable palm oil in Colombia

V. Marin-Burgos, Joy S. Clancy, Jonathan Cranidge Lovett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Voluntary certification schemes aimed at assuring producer compliance with a set of sustainability criteria have emerged as market-based instruments (MBIs) of sustainability governance. However, the impacts they tackle can be part of a complex arena of socio-environmental conflict, where values and powers of business and local actors compete. Legitimacy of these schemes not only results from compliance by business actors; but also depends on acceptance by local actors affected by, or resisting the industries that these mechanisms aim to govern. This paper explores the influence of different local actors' values and powers on legitimacy granting or contestation by local actors during national processes of sustainability criteria development. We analyse the case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in Colombia using an approach that combines concepts of ecological economics and political ecology with the legitimacy literature based on critical sociology. In Colombia, the palm oil industry led the initiative to implement certification under national interpretation of RSPO principles and criteria. However, the national interpretation process revealed power asymmetries among stakeholders and clashes between their different values. This resulted in strong contestation of RSPO legitimacy by local actors who resist expansion of oil palm cultivation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-313
Number of pages11
JournalEcological economics
Volume117
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2015

Fingerprint

certification
valuation
asymmetry
sustainability
oil
compliance
ecological economics
oil industry
stakeholder
market
Palm oil
Sustainability
Asymmetry
Colombia
Language
Certification
Legitimacy
industry

Keywords

  • IR-92779
  • METIS-306658

Cite this

@article{2f1a1c325cd84b7989ff3feaf7b0bfca,
title = "Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: valuation languages and power asymmetries in the roundtable on sustainable palm oil in Colombia",
abstract = "Voluntary certification schemes aimed at assuring producer compliance with a set of sustainability criteria have emerged as market-based instruments (MBIs) of sustainability governance. However, the impacts they tackle can be part of a complex arena of socio-environmental conflict, where values and powers of business and local actors compete. Legitimacy of these schemes not only results from compliance by business actors; but also depends on acceptance by local actors affected by, or resisting the industries that these mechanisms aim to govern. This paper explores the influence of different local actors' values and powers on legitimacy granting or contestation by local actors during national processes of sustainability criteria development. We analyse the case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in Colombia using an approach that combines concepts of ecological economics and political ecology with the legitimacy literature based on critical sociology. In Colombia, the palm oil industry led the initiative to implement certification under national interpretation of RSPO principles and criteria. However, the national interpretation process revealed power asymmetries among stakeholders and clashes between their different values. This resulted in strong contestation of RSPO legitimacy by local actors who resist expansion of oil palm cultivation.",
keywords = "IR-92779, METIS-306658",
author = "V. Marin-Burgos and Clancy, {Joy S.} and Lovett, {Jonathan Cranidge}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.011",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "303--313",
journal = "Ecological economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: valuation languages and power asymmetries in the roundtable on sustainable palm oil in Colombia. / Marin-Burgos, V.; Clancy, Joy S.; Lovett, Jonathan Cranidge.

In: Ecological economics, Vol. 117, 13.05.2015, p. 303-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contesting legitimacy of voluntary sustainability certification schemes: valuation languages and power asymmetries in the roundtable on sustainable palm oil in Colombia

AU - Marin-Burgos, V.

AU - Clancy, Joy S.

AU - Lovett, Jonathan Cranidge

PY - 2015/5/13

Y1 - 2015/5/13

N2 - Voluntary certification schemes aimed at assuring producer compliance with a set of sustainability criteria have emerged as market-based instruments (MBIs) of sustainability governance. However, the impacts they tackle can be part of a complex arena of socio-environmental conflict, where values and powers of business and local actors compete. Legitimacy of these schemes not only results from compliance by business actors; but also depends on acceptance by local actors affected by, or resisting the industries that these mechanisms aim to govern. This paper explores the influence of different local actors' values and powers on legitimacy granting or contestation by local actors during national processes of sustainability criteria development. We analyse the case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in Colombia using an approach that combines concepts of ecological economics and political ecology with the legitimacy literature based on critical sociology. In Colombia, the palm oil industry led the initiative to implement certification under national interpretation of RSPO principles and criteria. However, the national interpretation process revealed power asymmetries among stakeholders and clashes between their different values. This resulted in strong contestation of RSPO legitimacy by local actors who resist expansion of oil palm cultivation.

AB - Voluntary certification schemes aimed at assuring producer compliance with a set of sustainability criteria have emerged as market-based instruments (MBIs) of sustainability governance. However, the impacts they tackle can be part of a complex arena of socio-environmental conflict, where values and powers of business and local actors compete. Legitimacy of these schemes not only results from compliance by business actors; but also depends on acceptance by local actors affected by, or resisting the industries that these mechanisms aim to govern. This paper explores the influence of different local actors' values and powers on legitimacy granting or contestation by local actors during national processes of sustainability criteria development. We analyse the case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) in Colombia using an approach that combines concepts of ecological economics and political ecology with the legitimacy literature based on critical sociology. In Colombia, the palm oil industry led the initiative to implement certification under national interpretation of RSPO principles and criteria. However, the national interpretation process revealed power asymmetries among stakeholders and clashes between their different values. This resulted in strong contestation of RSPO legitimacy by local actors who resist expansion of oil palm cultivation.

KW - IR-92779

KW - METIS-306658

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.011

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 303

EP - 313

JO - Ecological economics

JF - Ecological economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -