Continuous Improvement and Collaborative Improvement: Similarities and Differences

H.G.A. Middel, Harm Boer, O.A.M. Fisscher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A substantial body of theoretical and practical knowledge has been developed on continuous improvement. However, there is still a considerable lack of empirically grounded contributions and theories on collaborative improvement, that is, continuous improvement in an inter-organizational setting. The CO-IMPROVE project investigated whether and how the concept of continuous improvement can be extended and transferred to such settings. The objective of this article is to evaluate the CO-IMPROVE research findings in view of existing theories on continuous innovation. The article investigates the similarities and differences between key components of continuous and collaborative improvement by assessing what is specific for continuous improvement, what for collaborative improvement, and where the two areas of application meet and overlap. The main conclusions are that there are many more similarities between continuous and collaborative improvement. The main differences relate to the role of hierarchy/market, trust, power and commitment to collaboration, all of which are related to differences between the settings in which continuous and collaborative improvement unfold.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)338-247
Number of pages10
JournalCreativity and innovation management
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • METIS-234333
  • IR-58453

Cite this

Middel, H.G.A. ; Boer, Harm ; Fisscher, O.A.M. / Continuous Improvement and Collaborative Improvement: Similarities and Differences. In: Creativity and innovation management. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 338-247.
@article{1a1c0802805b424189da4abcbb41f794,
title = "Continuous Improvement and Collaborative Improvement: Similarities and Differences",
abstract = "A substantial body of theoretical and practical knowledge has been developed on continuous improvement. However, there is still a considerable lack of empirically grounded contributions and theories on collaborative improvement, that is, continuous improvement in an inter-organizational setting. The CO-IMPROVE project investigated whether and how the concept of continuous improvement can be extended and transferred to such settings. The objective of this article is to evaluate the CO-IMPROVE research findings in view of existing theories on continuous innovation. The article investigates the similarities and differences between key components of continuous and collaborative improvement by assessing what is specific for continuous improvement, what for collaborative improvement, and where the two areas of application meet and overlap. The main conclusions are that there are many more similarities between continuous and collaborative improvement. The main differences relate to the role of hierarchy/market, trust, power and commitment to collaboration, all of which are related to differences between the settings in which continuous and collaborative improvement unfold.",
keywords = "METIS-234333, IR-58453",
author = "H.G.A. Middel and Harm Boer and O.A.M. Fisscher",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00407.x",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "15",
pages = "338--247",
journal = "Creativity and innovation management",
issn = "0963-1690",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

Continuous Improvement and Collaborative Improvement: Similarities and Differences. / Middel, H.G.A.; Boer, Harm; Fisscher, O.A.M.

In: Creativity and innovation management, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2006, p. 338-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuous Improvement and Collaborative Improvement: Similarities and Differences

AU - Middel, H.G.A.

AU - Boer, Harm

AU - Fisscher, O.A.M.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - A substantial body of theoretical and practical knowledge has been developed on continuous improvement. However, there is still a considerable lack of empirically grounded contributions and theories on collaborative improvement, that is, continuous improvement in an inter-organizational setting. The CO-IMPROVE project investigated whether and how the concept of continuous improvement can be extended and transferred to such settings. The objective of this article is to evaluate the CO-IMPROVE research findings in view of existing theories on continuous innovation. The article investigates the similarities and differences between key components of continuous and collaborative improvement by assessing what is specific for continuous improvement, what for collaborative improvement, and where the two areas of application meet and overlap. The main conclusions are that there are many more similarities between continuous and collaborative improvement. The main differences relate to the role of hierarchy/market, trust, power and commitment to collaboration, all of which are related to differences between the settings in which continuous and collaborative improvement unfold.

AB - A substantial body of theoretical and practical knowledge has been developed on continuous improvement. However, there is still a considerable lack of empirically grounded contributions and theories on collaborative improvement, that is, continuous improvement in an inter-organizational setting. The CO-IMPROVE project investigated whether and how the concept of continuous improvement can be extended and transferred to such settings. The objective of this article is to evaluate the CO-IMPROVE research findings in view of existing theories on continuous innovation. The article investigates the similarities and differences between key components of continuous and collaborative improvement by assessing what is specific for continuous improvement, what for collaborative improvement, and where the two areas of application meet and overlap. The main conclusions are that there are many more similarities between continuous and collaborative improvement. The main differences relate to the role of hierarchy/market, trust, power and commitment to collaboration, all of which are related to differences between the settings in which continuous and collaborative improvement unfold.

KW - METIS-234333

KW - IR-58453

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00407.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00407.x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 338

EP - 247

JO - Creativity and innovation management

JF - Creativity and innovation management

SN - 0963-1690

IS - 4

ER -