Converge or not converge: the European Union and higher education policies in the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany

V. Rakic, Vojin Rakic

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    • 10 Citations

    Abstract

    This article examines the impact of European integration on higher education policies of the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany. The analysis of higher education policies in the three countries is part of a broader project, which focuses on a majority of E.U. member states. The selection of the three countries for this paper is not based on any methodological considerations. The question addressed is if higher education policies of member states are converging, diverging or not changing at all, and whether such developments are a consequence of the policies of the European Union (E.U.) or of other factors (e.g., the globalization of the market or of institutions imitating each other). A preliminary assessment leads to the conclusion that a number of important indications of convergence are present in national policy arrangements in the field of higher education (in particular student mobility and quality assurance, but less in the structure of higher education systems My attention will be focused on the structure of higher education systems, on quality assurance and on student and teacher mobility. These domains appear to cover most relevant issues pertaining to higher education policies in the European Union member states (funding of higher education is sometimes considered as a separate domain, but it can also be regarded as an element of the structure of higher education systems, while it is also related to the issue of quality assurance).). The European Union, however, does not have much legal authority in the policy sector in question. Thus, an explanation for converging national policies may lie elsewhere, in part in the concept of “institutional isomorphism”.
    LanguageUndefined
    Pages225-240
    Number of pages16
    JournalHigher education policy
    Volume14
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • Institutional isomorphism
    • Convergence
    • IR-74496
    • METIS-205486
    • Higher education systems

    Cite this

    @article{3d061a462c8543a1bb334b29cb0ff45a,
    title = "Converge or not converge: the European Union and higher education policies in the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany",
    abstract = "This article examines the impact of European integration on higher education policies of the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany. The analysis of higher education policies in the three countries is part of a broader project, which focuses on a majority of E.U. member states. The selection of the three countries for this paper is not based on any methodological considerations. The question addressed is if higher education policies of member states are converging, diverging or not changing at all, and whether such developments are a consequence of the policies of the European Union (E.U.) or of other factors (e.g., the globalization of the market or of institutions imitating each other). A preliminary assessment leads to the conclusion that a number of important indications of convergence are present in national policy arrangements in the field of higher education (in particular student mobility and quality assurance, but less in the structure of higher education systems My attention will be focused on the structure of higher education systems, on quality assurance and on student and teacher mobility. These domains appear to cover most relevant issues pertaining to higher education policies in the European Union member states (funding of higher education is sometimes considered as a separate domain, but it can also be regarded as an element of the structure of higher education systems, while it is also related to the issue of quality assurance).). The European Union, however, does not have much legal authority in the policy sector in question. Thus, an explanation for converging national policies may lie elsewhere, in part in the concept of “institutional isomorphism”.",
    keywords = "Institutional isomorphism, Convergence, IR-74496, METIS-205486, Higher education systems",
    author = "V. Rakic and Vojin Rakic",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00016-2",
    language = "Undefined",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "225--240",
    journal = "Higher education policy",
    issn = "0952-8733",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
    number = "3",

    }

    Converge or not converge: the European Union and higher education policies in the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany. / Rakic, V.; Rakic, Vojin.

    In: Higher education policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2001, p. 225-240.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Converge or not converge: the European Union and higher education policies in the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany

    AU - Rakic,V.

    AU - Rakic,Vojin

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - This article examines the impact of European integration on higher education policies of the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany. The analysis of higher education policies in the three countries is part of a broader project, which focuses on a majority of E.U. member states. The selection of the three countries for this paper is not based on any methodological considerations. The question addressed is if higher education policies of member states are converging, diverging or not changing at all, and whether such developments are a consequence of the policies of the European Union (E.U.) or of other factors (e.g., the globalization of the market or of institutions imitating each other). A preliminary assessment leads to the conclusion that a number of important indications of convergence are present in national policy arrangements in the field of higher education (in particular student mobility and quality assurance, but less in the structure of higher education systems My attention will be focused on the structure of higher education systems, on quality assurance and on student and teacher mobility. These domains appear to cover most relevant issues pertaining to higher education policies in the European Union member states (funding of higher education is sometimes considered as a separate domain, but it can also be regarded as an element of the structure of higher education systems, while it is also related to the issue of quality assurance).). The European Union, however, does not have much legal authority in the policy sector in question. Thus, an explanation for converging national policies may lie elsewhere, in part in the concept of “institutional isomorphism”.

    AB - This article examines the impact of European integration on higher education policies of the Netherlands, Belgium/Flanders and Germany. The analysis of higher education policies in the three countries is part of a broader project, which focuses on a majority of E.U. member states. The selection of the three countries for this paper is not based on any methodological considerations. The question addressed is if higher education policies of member states are converging, diverging or not changing at all, and whether such developments are a consequence of the policies of the European Union (E.U.) or of other factors (e.g., the globalization of the market or of institutions imitating each other). A preliminary assessment leads to the conclusion that a number of important indications of convergence are present in national policy arrangements in the field of higher education (in particular student mobility and quality assurance, but less in the structure of higher education systems My attention will be focused on the structure of higher education systems, on quality assurance and on student and teacher mobility. These domains appear to cover most relevant issues pertaining to higher education policies in the European Union member states (funding of higher education is sometimes considered as a separate domain, but it can also be regarded as an element of the structure of higher education systems, while it is also related to the issue of quality assurance).). The European Union, however, does not have much legal authority in the policy sector in question. Thus, an explanation for converging national policies may lie elsewhere, in part in the concept of “institutional isomorphism”.

    KW - Institutional isomorphism

    KW - Convergence

    KW - IR-74496

    KW - METIS-205486

    KW - Higher education systems

    U2 - 10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00016-2

    DO - 10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00016-2

    M3 - Article

    VL - 14

    SP - 225

    EP - 240

    JO - Higher education policy

    T2 - Higher education policy

    JF - Higher education policy

    SN - 0952-8733

    IS - 3

    ER -