Converging Trends of Social Policy in Europe: Social Security Benefit Reform in the UK, the Netherlands and Finland

Minna van Gerven*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been suggested that similar challenges in the socio-economic environments of European welfare states necessitate convergence of national social security benefit programmes. However, convergence remains an ambiguous matter in social policy research, both with regard to its conceptualisation and to its operationalisation. This article attempts to contribute to this debate by revisiting the concept of convergence and analysing empirically the welfare reforms in three European countries (the UK, the Netherlands, Finland) and two benefit programmes (unemployment and disability insurance benefit programmes) over a period of 26 years (1980–2006). Based on data relating to legal changes in benefit rights and conditions, it is argued that changes in European social security programme have, over time, moved the programmes towards common points. The reforms in the countries that are examined highlight four trends, namely increased work-relatedness in benefit rules, growing activation of benefit recipients, more stringent targeting of the programmes and reduced generosity of benefit entitlements. The data are also used to demonstrate the importance of an analytical approach as a general theoretical device: the article demonstrates how convergence occurred only at the level of broad policy goals, and not at the level of policy instruments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-225
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Security
Volume10
Issue number3
Early online date1 Sep 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Convergence
  • Social security
  • Welfare state reform
  • n/a OA procedure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Converging Trends of Social Policy in Europe: Social Security Benefit Reform in the UK, the Netherlands and Finland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this