Corporate Governance and Institutional Strategic Transparency in Emerging Markets

Carla C.J.M. Millar-Schijf, T.I. Eldomiaty, C.J. Choi, B.J. Hilton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    90 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper posits that differences in corporate governance structure partly result from differences in institutional arrangements linked to business systems. We developed a new international triad of business systems: the Anglo-American, the Communitarian and the Emerging system, building on the frameworks of Choi et al. (British Academy of Management (Kynoch Birmingham) 1996, Management International Review 39, 257-279, 1999). A common factor determining the success of a corporate governance structure is the extent to which it is transparent to market forces. Such transparency is more than pure financial transparency; as it can also be based on factors such as governmental, banking and other types of institutional transparency mechanism. There may also be a choice for firms to adopt voluntary corporate disclosure in situations where mandatory disclosure is not established. The Asian financial crisis of 1997-1999 and the more recent corporate governance scandals such as Enron, Andersen and Worldcom in the United States and Ahold and Parmalat in Europe show that corporate governance and business ethics issues exist throughout the world. As an illustration we focus on Asia's emerging markets, as, both in view of the pressure of globalization and taking into account the institutional arrangements peculiar to the emerging business system, these issues are important there. Particularly for those who have to find an accommodation between the corporate governance structures and disclosure standards of the Emerging system and those of the Anglo-American and Communitarian systems.Key words: Asia's emerging markets, institutional transparency, corporate governance, international business systems
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)163-174
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of business ethics
    Volume59
    Issue number1-2
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Keywords

    • METIS-224394

    Cite this