Abstract
The authors regret that there was a mistake in calculating the mol% of the microbubble coating composition used. For all experiments the unit in mg/ml was utilized and the conversion mistake only came when converting to mol% to define the ratio between the coating formulation components. The correct molecular weight of PEG-40 stearate is 2046.54 g/mol (Kilic & Bolukcu, 2018; Shen et al., 2008), not 328.53 g/mol. On page 221, it should read “The coating was composed of DSPC (84.8 mol%; Sigma-Aldrich), PEG-40 stearate (8.2 mol%; Sigma-Aldrich), DSPE-PEG(2000) (5.9 mol%; Avanti Polar Lipids) and DSPE-PEG(2000)-biotin (1.1 mol%; Avanti Polar Lipids).” This correction does not change the conclusions published in this study. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. The published article can be found here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bit.25337.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2386-2386 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Biotechnology and bioengineering |
| Volume | 118 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum for "Intravital microscopy of localized stem cell delivery using microbubbles and acoustic radiation force" (vol 112, pg 220-227, 2015)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Intravital microscopy of localized stem cell delivery using microbubbles and acoustic radiation force
Kokhuis, T. J. A., Skachkov, I., Naaijkens, B. A., Juffermans, L. J. M., Kamp, O., Kooiman, K., van der Steen, A. F. W., Versluis, M. & de Jong, N., 1 Jan 2015, In: Biotechnology and bioengineering. 112, 1, p. 220-227 8 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Open AccessFile37 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)35 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver