Research output per year
Research output per year
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic
The authors regret that in the published article the statement in the Introduction: “New insights … mechanistically invalid.” was not phrased more cautiously. The sentence should read: “New insights, however, have revealed that at least three different adsorption sites can be present [7, 8] and showed that direct CO hydrogenation on Cu/ZnO catalysts is blocked [9, 10].” Furthermore, the word “sole” in section 2.1 (first alinea; in “… CO2 is the sole carbon source…”) should be replaced by “dominant”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 163105 |
| Journal | Chemical Engineering Journal |
| Volume | 514 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 15 Jun 2025 |
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review