Corrigendum to “Inaccuracies in contact resistivity from the Cox–Strack method: A review” [Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 246 (2022) 111909]

Bas van Wijngaarden, Junchun Yang, Jurriaan Schmitz*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors regret to have incorrectly presented equation (7). In this equation, the given threshold value of 225 should be 900 to be in quantitative agreement with the referred article. As a consequence, in the final line of Table 2, the same criterion now leads to a slight correction: 57 passing versus 11 failing articles. In the Conclusion section the fourth line should therefore read: Another 11 articles suffer from spreading resistance in a conductive top layer. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112254
JournalSolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Volume254
Early online date20 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Inaccuracies in contact resistivity from the Cox–Strack method: A review” [Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 246 (2022) 111909]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this