Abstract
The authors regret a mistake in simulations of the excitation coils. As a result, the used field strengths are much smaller than mentioned in the paper. In the paper we described that the AC field is 0.5 mT and the DC field is 50 mT at the location of the sample. However, this should be 0.2 mT AC and 3.3 mT DC. This won’t affect any of the results or conclusions described in the paper. We think it is even more promising that the method works this well at these low field strengths. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 165362 |
| Journal | Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials |
| Volume | 493 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
Keywords
- n/a OA procedure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Separation of excitation and detection coils for in vivo detection of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles” (Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (2019) 475 (563–569), (S0304885318327276), (10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.12.012))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Separation of excitation and detection coils for in vivo detection of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
van de Loosdrecht, M. M., Waanders, S., Krooshoop, H. J. G. & ten Haken, B., 1 Apr 2019, In: Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials. 475, p. 563-569 7 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Open AccessFile12 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)794 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver