Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review

Camino Liquete*, Chiara Piroddi, Evangelia G. Drakou, Leigh Gurney, Stelios Katsanevakis, Aymen Charef, Benis Egoh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

202 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:Research on ecosystem services has grown exponentially during the last decade. Most of the studies have focused on assessing and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services highlighting a knowledge gap on marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES) and an urgent need to assess them.Methodology/Principal Findings:We reviewed and summarized existing scientific literature related to MCES with the aim of extracting and classifying indicators used to assess and map them. We found 145 papers that specifically assessed marine and coastal ecosystem services from which we extracted 476 indicators. Food provision, in particular fisheries, was the most extensively analyzed MCES while water purification and coastal protection were the most frequently studied regulating and maintenance services. Also recreation and tourism under the cultural services was relatively well assessed. We highlight knowledge gaps regarding the availability of indicators that measure the capacity, flow or benefit derived from each ecosystem service. The majority of the case studies was found in mangroves and coastal wetlands and was mainly concentrated in Europe and North America. Our systematic review highlighted the need of an improved ecosystem service classification for marine and coastal systems, which is herein proposed with definitions and links to previous classifications.Conclusions/Significance:This review summarizes the state of available information related to ecosystem services associated with marine and coastal ecosystems. The cataloging of MCES indicators and the integrated classification of MCES provided in this paper establish a background that can facilitate the planning and integration of future assessments. The final goal is to establish a consistent structure and populate it with information able to support the implementation of biodiversity conservation policies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere67737
Number of pages15
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume8
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

systematic review
ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Ecosystem
Cataloging
water purification
Literature
Recreation
Fisheries
Wetlands
tourism
Water Purification
recreation
Biodiversity
North America
Purification
wetlands
Conservation
planning
fisheries

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

Liquete, Camino ; Piroddi, Chiara ; Drakou, Evangelia G. ; Gurney, Leigh ; Katsanevakis, Stelios ; Charef, Aymen ; Egoh, Benis. / Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services : A Systematic Review. In: PLoS ONE. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 7.
@article{adf99235a0d649a1aecf893e03e35a84,
title = "Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Background:Research on ecosystem services has grown exponentially during the last decade. Most of the studies have focused on assessing and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services highlighting a knowledge gap on marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES) and an urgent need to assess them.Methodology/Principal Findings:We reviewed and summarized existing scientific literature related to MCES with the aim of extracting and classifying indicators used to assess and map them. We found 145 papers that specifically assessed marine and coastal ecosystem services from which we extracted 476 indicators. Food provision, in particular fisheries, was the most extensively analyzed MCES while water purification and coastal protection were the most frequently studied regulating and maintenance services. Also recreation and tourism under the cultural services was relatively well assessed. We highlight knowledge gaps regarding the availability of indicators that measure the capacity, flow or benefit derived from each ecosystem service. The majority of the case studies was found in mangroves and coastal wetlands and was mainly concentrated in Europe and North America. Our systematic review highlighted the need of an improved ecosystem service classification for marine and coastal systems, which is herein proposed with definitions and links to previous classifications.Conclusions/Significance:This review summarizes the state of available information related to ecosystem services associated with marine and coastal ecosystems. The cataloging of MCES indicators and the integrated classification of MCES provided in this paper establish a background that can facilitate the planning and integration of future assessments. The final goal is to establish a consistent structure and populate it with information able to support the implementation of biodiversity conservation policies.",
keywords = "ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "Camino Liquete and Chiara Piroddi and Drakou, {Evangelia G.} and Leigh Gurney and Stelios Katsanevakis and Aymen Charef and Benis Egoh",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0067737",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services : A Systematic Review. / Liquete, Camino; Piroddi, Chiara; Drakou, Evangelia G.; Gurney, Leigh; Katsanevakis, Stelios; Charef, Aymen; Egoh, Benis.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 7, e67737, 03.07.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current Status and Future Prospects for the Assessment of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Liquete, Camino

AU - Piroddi, Chiara

AU - Drakou, Evangelia G.

AU - Gurney, Leigh

AU - Katsanevakis, Stelios

AU - Charef, Aymen

AU - Egoh, Benis

PY - 2013/7/3

Y1 - 2013/7/3

N2 - Background:Research on ecosystem services has grown exponentially during the last decade. Most of the studies have focused on assessing and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services highlighting a knowledge gap on marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES) and an urgent need to assess them.Methodology/Principal Findings:We reviewed and summarized existing scientific literature related to MCES with the aim of extracting and classifying indicators used to assess and map them. We found 145 papers that specifically assessed marine and coastal ecosystem services from which we extracted 476 indicators. Food provision, in particular fisheries, was the most extensively analyzed MCES while water purification and coastal protection were the most frequently studied regulating and maintenance services. Also recreation and tourism under the cultural services was relatively well assessed. We highlight knowledge gaps regarding the availability of indicators that measure the capacity, flow or benefit derived from each ecosystem service. The majority of the case studies was found in mangroves and coastal wetlands and was mainly concentrated in Europe and North America. Our systematic review highlighted the need of an improved ecosystem service classification for marine and coastal systems, which is herein proposed with definitions and links to previous classifications.Conclusions/Significance:This review summarizes the state of available information related to ecosystem services associated with marine and coastal ecosystems. The cataloging of MCES indicators and the integrated classification of MCES provided in this paper establish a background that can facilitate the planning and integration of future assessments. The final goal is to establish a consistent structure and populate it with information able to support the implementation of biodiversity conservation policies.

AB - Background:Research on ecosystem services has grown exponentially during the last decade. Most of the studies have focused on assessing and mapping terrestrial ecosystem services highlighting a knowledge gap on marine and coastal ecosystem services (MCES) and an urgent need to assess them.Methodology/Principal Findings:We reviewed and summarized existing scientific literature related to MCES with the aim of extracting and classifying indicators used to assess and map them. We found 145 papers that specifically assessed marine and coastal ecosystem services from which we extracted 476 indicators. Food provision, in particular fisheries, was the most extensively analyzed MCES while water purification and coastal protection were the most frequently studied regulating and maintenance services. Also recreation and tourism under the cultural services was relatively well assessed. We highlight knowledge gaps regarding the availability of indicators that measure the capacity, flow or benefit derived from each ecosystem service. The majority of the case studies was found in mangroves and coastal wetlands and was mainly concentrated in Europe and North America. Our systematic review highlighted the need of an improved ecosystem service classification for marine and coastal systems, which is herein proposed with definitions and links to previous classifications.Conclusions/Significance:This review summarizes the state of available information related to ecosystem services associated with marine and coastal ecosystems. The cataloging of MCES indicators and the integrated classification of MCES provided in this paper establish a background that can facilitate the planning and integration of future assessments. The final goal is to establish a consistent structure and populate it with information able to support the implementation of biodiversity conservation policies.

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0067737

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0067737

M3 - Article

C2 - 23844080

AN - SCOPUS:84879763199

VL - 8

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e67737

ER -