Abstract
Organizations prepare for crisis communication by designing, implementing, and evaluating procedures, scenarios, and emergency measures. In addition to crisis communication, risk communication is a concern for many organizations as well. Risk communication is viewed as an interactive, multi-actor democratic process. Traditionally, risk communication is seen as a linear, top-down, elitist, expert-to-public approach. In this paper, the relation between crisis communication and risk communication is described. In addition, a model is presented based on the notion that crisis communication should be proactive, and focusing on the management of the relation between the organization and its relevant stakeholders or the organization’s reputation. The new thinking on the risk communication process is essential for an organization’s crisis and reputation management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 236-246 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Document design |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
Keywords
- IR-94596
- METIS-200986
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Current views on risk communication and their implications for crisis and reputation management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver