Cyberwar and Mediation Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cyberwar (military operations conducted via computer networks) is often downplayed compared to traditional military operations as they are largely invisible to outside observers, difficult to convincingly attribute to a particular source and rarely cause physical damage or obvious harm. We use mediation theory to argue that cyberwar operations cause harm by undermining trust in computerised devices and networks and by disrupting the transparency of our usage of information technology in our daily lives. Cyberwar operations militarise and weaponise the civilian space of the Internet by co-opting and targeting civilian infrastructure and property. These operations (and the possibility of such operations occurring) fundamentally change users’ Internet experience by fostering fear and paranoia about otherwise unnoticed and transparent aspects of their lives, similarly to how biological and chemical weapons create fear and paranoia about breathing, eating, and physical exposure to the world. We argue that the phenomenological aspects of cyberwar operations offer a compelling justification for prohibiting cyberwar in the same manner in which biological and chemical warfare are prohibited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-78
JournalDelphi
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

mediation
Military
chemical weapon
biological weapon
anxiety
Internet
cause
warfare
eating behavior
transparency
damages
information technology
infrastructure
experience

Keywords

  • cyber war
  • Mediation Theory
  • Postphenomenology
  • Technological mediation
  • Ethics of Technology
  • military ethics

Cite this

Gertz, Nolen ; Verbeek, Peter-Paul ; Douglas, David. / Cyberwar and Mediation Theory. In: Delphi. 2019 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 72-78.
@article{f469fc6c53c845d4b19542d4c07ab171,
title = "Cyberwar and Mediation Theory",
abstract = "Cyberwar (military operations conducted via computer networks) is often downplayed compared to traditional military operations as they are largely invisible to outside observers, difficult to convincingly attribute to a particular source and rarely cause physical damage or obvious harm. We use mediation theory to argue that cyberwar operations cause harm by undermining trust in computerised devices and networks and by disrupting the transparency of our usage of information technology in our daily lives. Cyberwar operations militarise and weaponise the civilian space of the Internet by co-opting and targeting civilian infrastructure and property. These operations (and the possibility of such operations occurring) fundamentally change users’ Internet experience by fostering fear and paranoia about otherwise unnoticed and transparent aspects of their lives, similarly to how biological and chemical weapons create fear and paranoia about breathing, eating, and physical exposure to the world. We argue that the phenomenological aspects of cyberwar operations offer a compelling justification for prohibiting cyberwar in the same manner in which biological and chemical warfare are prohibited.",
keywords = "cyber war, Mediation Theory, Postphenomenology, Technological mediation, Ethics of Technology, military ethics",
author = "Nolen Gertz and Peter-Paul Verbeek and David Douglas",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.21552/delphi/2019/2/5",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "72--78",
journal = "Delphi",
issn = "2626-3734",
publisher = "Lexxion",
number = "2",

}

Cyberwar and Mediation Theory. / Gertz, Nolen ; Verbeek, Peter-Paul ; Douglas, David.

In: Delphi, Vol. 2, No. 2, 15.08.2019, p. 72-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cyberwar and Mediation Theory

AU - Gertz, Nolen

AU - Verbeek, Peter-Paul

AU - Douglas, David

PY - 2019/8/15

Y1 - 2019/8/15

N2 - Cyberwar (military operations conducted via computer networks) is often downplayed compared to traditional military operations as they are largely invisible to outside observers, difficult to convincingly attribute to a particular source and rarely cause physical damage or obvious harm. We use mediation theory to argue that cyberwar operations cause harm by undermining trust in computerised devices and networks and by disrupting the transparency of our usage of information technology in our daily lives. Cyberwar operations militarise and weaponise the civilian space of the Internet by co-opting and targeting civilian infrastructure and property. These operations (and the possibility of such operations occurring) fundamentally change users’ Internet experience by fostering fear and paranoia about otherwise unnoticed and transparent aspects of their lives, similarly to how biological and chemical weapons create fear and paranoia about breathing, eating, and physical exposure to the world. We argue that the phenomenological aspects of cyberwar operations offer a compelling justification for prohibiting cyberwar in the same manner in which biological and chemical warfare are prohibited.

AB - Cyberwar (military operations conducted via computer networks) is often downplayed compared to traditional military operations as they are largely invisible to outside observers, difficult to convincingly attribute to a particular source and rarely cause physical damage or obvious harm. We use mediation theory to argue that cyberwar operations cause harm by undermining trust in computerised devices and networks and by disrupting the transparency of our usage of information technology in our daily lives. Cyberwar operations militarise and weaponise the civilian space of the Internet by co-opting and targeting civilian infrastructure and property. These operations (and the possibility of such operations occurring) fundamentally change users’ Internet experience by fostering fear and paranoia about otherwise unnoticed and transparent aspects of their lives, similarly to how biological and chemical weapons create fear and paranoia about breathing, eating, and physical exposure to the world. We argue that the phenomenological aspects of cyberwar operations offer a compelling justification for prohibiting cyberwar in the same manner in which biological and chemical warfare are prohibited.

KW - cyber war

KW - Mediation Theory

KW - Postphenomenology

KW - Technological mediation

KW - Ethics of Technology

KW - military ethics

U2 - 10.21552/delphi/2019/2/5

DO - 10.21552/delphi/2019/2/5

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 72

EP - 78

JO - Delphi

JF - Delphi

SN - 2626-3734

IS - 2

ER -