Cyberwar and mediation theory

Nolen Gertz*, Peter-Paul Verbeek, David Douglas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

318 Downloads (Pure)


Cyberwar (military operations conducted via computer networks) is often downplayed compared to traditional military operations as they are largely invisible to outside observers, difficult to convincingly attribute to a particular source and rarely cause physical damage or obvious harm. We use mediation theory to argue that cyberwar operations cause harm by undermining trust in computerised devices and networks and by disrupting the transparency of our usage of information technology in our daily lives. Cyberwar operations militarise and weaponise the civilian space of the Internet by co-opting and targeting civilian infrastructure and property. These operations (and the possibility of such operations occurring) fundamentally change users’ Internet experience by fostering fear and paranoia about otherwise unnoticed and transparent aspects of their lives, similarly to how biological and chemical weapons create fear and paranoia about breathing, eating, and physical exposure to the world. We argue that the phenomenological aspects of cyberwar operations offer a compelling justification for prohibiting cyberwar in the same manner in which biological and chemical warfare are prohibited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-78
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2019


  • cyber war
  • Mediation Theory
  • Postphenomenology
  • Technological mediation
  • Ethics of Technology
  • military ethics


Dive into the research topics of 'Cyberwar and mediation theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this