Abstract
This paper presents the current state of the art on attack and defense modeling approaches that are based on directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). DAGs allow for a hierarchical decomposition of complex scenarios into simple, easily understandable and quantifiable actions. Methods based on threat trees and Bayesian networks are two well-known approaches to security modeling. However there exist more than 30 DAG-based methodologies, each having different features and goals.
The objective of this survey is to summarize the existing methodologies, compare their features, and propose a taxonomy of the described formalisms. This article also supports the selection of an adequate modeling technique depending on user requirements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-38 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Computer science review |
| Volume | 13-14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/318003
- EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/2007-2013
- Graphical models for security
- Quantitative and qualitative security assessment
- Security measures
- Attack trees
- Attack and defense modeling
- Bayesian Networks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'DAG-based attack and defense modeling: don’t miss the forest for the attack trees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver