Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe

D. Reckien, Monica Salvia, Filomena Pietrapertosa, Sofia G. Simoes, Marta Olazabal, S. De Gregorio Hurtado, Davide Geneletti, Eliška Krkoška Lorencová, Valentina D'alonzo, Anna Krook-riekkola, Paris A. Fokaides, Byron I. Ioannou, Aoife Foley, Hans Orru, Kati Orru, Anja Wejs, J. Flacke, Jon Marco Church, Efrén Feliu, Sergiu VasilieCristiana Nador, Marko Matosović, Alexandros Flamos, Niki-artemis Spyridaki, Mario V. Balzan, Orsolya Fülöp, Stelios Grafakos, Ivan Paspaldzhiev, Oliver Heidrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cities are gaining prominence committing to respond to the threat of climate change, e.g., by developing local climate plans or strategies. However, little is known regarding the approaches and processes of plan development and implementation, or the success and effectiveness of proposed measures. Mainstreaming is regarded as one approach associated with (implementation) success, but the extent of integration of local climate policies and plans in ongoing sectoral and/or development planning is unclear. This paper analyses 885 cities across the 28 European countries to create a first reference baseline on the degree of climate mainstreaming in local climate plans. This will help to compare the benefits of mainstreaming versus dedicated climate plans, looking at policy effectiveness and ultimately delivery of much needed climate change efforts at the city level. All core cities of the European Urban Audit sample were analyzed, and their local climate plans classified as dedicated or mainstreamed in other local policy initiatives. It was found that the degree of mainstreaming is low for mitigation (9% of reviewed cities; 12% of the identified plans) and somewhat higher for adaptation (10% of cities; 29% of plans). In particular horizontal mainstreaming is a major effort for local authorities; an effort that does not necessarily pay off in terms of success of action implementation. This study concludes that climate change issues in local municipalities are best tackled by either, developing a dedicated local climate plan in parallel to a mainstreamed plan or by subsequently developing first the dedicated and later a mainstreaming plan (joint or subsequent “dual track approach”). Cities that currently provide dedicated local climate plans (66% of cities for mitigation; 26% of cities for adaptation) may follow-up with a mainstreaming approach. This promises effective implementation of tangible climate actions as well as subsequent diffusion of climate issues into other local sector policies. The development of only broad sustainability or resilience strategies is seen as critical.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)948-959
Number of pages12
JournalRenewable & sustainable energy reviews
Volume112
Early online date26 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Climate change
Sustainable development
Planning

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Mitigation/ adaptation tracking
  • Europe
  • Mainstreaming
  • EU-28
  • Mitigation
  • Mitigation/ adaptation stocktaking
  • Local climate policy/ planning
  • Urban audit
  • Monetoring and evaluation (M&E)
  • Urban areas/ cities
  • Adaptation

Cite this

Reckien, D., Salvia, M., Pietrapertosa, F., Simoes, S. G., Olazabal, M., De Gregorio Hurtado, S., ... Heidrich, O. (2019). Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe. Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 112, 948-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.014
Reckien, D. ; Salvia, Monica ; Pietrapertosa, Filomena ; Simoes, Sofia G. ; Olazabal, Marta ; De Gregorio Hurtado, S. ; Geneletti, Davide ; Lorencová, Eliška Krkoška ; D'alonzo, Valentina ; Krook-riekkola, Anna ; Fokaides, Paris A. ; Ioannou, Byron I. ; Foley, Aoife ; Orru, Hans ; Orru, Kati ; Wejs, Anja ; Flacke, J. ; Church, Jon Marco ; Feliu, Efrén ; Vasilie, Sergiu ; Nador, Cristiana ; Matosović, Marko ; Flamos, Alexandros ; Spyridaki, Niki-artemis ; Balzan, Mario V. ; Fülöp, Orsolya ; Grafakos, Stelios ; Paspaldzhiev, Ivan ; Heidrich, Oliver. / Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe. In: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews. 2019 ; Vol. 112. pp. 948-959.
@article{f97bae9fea794ed8ae771b53e7e8bb80,
title = "Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe",
abstract = "Cities are gaining prominence committing to respond to the threat of climate change, e.g., by developing local climate plans or strategies. However, little is known regarding the approaches and processes of plan development and implementation, or the success and effectiveness of proposed measures. Mainstreaming is regarded as one approach associated with (implementation) success, but the extent of integration of local climate policies and plans in ongoing sectoral and/or development planning is unclear. This paper analyses 885 cities across the 28 European countries to create a first reference baseline on the degree of climate mainstreaming in local climate plans. This will help to compare the benefits of mainstreaming versus dedicated climate plans, looking at policy effectiveness and ultimately delivery of much needed climate change efforts at the city level. All core cities of the European Urban Audit sample were analyzed, and their local climate plans classified as dedicated or mainstreamed in other local policy initiatives. It was found that the degree of mainstreaming is low for mitigation (9{\%} of reviewed cities; 12{\%} of the identified plans) and somewhat higher for adaptation (10{\%} of cities; 29{\%} of plans). In particular horizontal mainstreaming is a major effort for local authorities; an effort that does not necessarily pay off in terms of success of action implementation. This study concludes that climate change issues in local municipalities are best tackled by either, developing a dedicated local climate plan in parallel to a mainstreamed plan or by subsequently developing first the dedicated and later a mainstreaming plan (joint or subsequent “dual track approach”). Cities that currently provide dedicated local climate plans (66{\%} of cities for mitigation; 26{\%} of cities for adaptation) may follow-up with a mainstreaming approach. This promises effective implementation of tangible climate actions as well as subsequent diffusion of climate issues into other local sector policies. The development of only broad sustainability or resilience strategies is seen as critical.",
keywords = "ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE, UT-Hybrid-D, Mitigation/ adaptation tracking, Europe, Mainstreaming, EU-28, Mitigation, Mitigation/ adaptation stocktaking, Local climate policy/ planning, Urban audit, Monetoring and evaluation (M&E), Urban areas/ cities, Adaptation",
author = "D. Reckien and Monica Salvia and Filomena Pietrapertosa and Simoes, {Sofia G.} and Marta Olazabal and {De Gregorio Hurtado}, S. and Davide Geneletti and Lorencov{\'a}, {Eliška Krkoška} and Valentina D'alonzo and Anna Krook-riekkola and Fokaides, {Paris A.} and Ioannou, {Byron I.} and Aoife Foley and Hans Orru and Kati Orru and Anja Wejs and J. Flacke and Church, {Jon Marco} and Efr{\'e}n Feliu and Sergiu Vasilie and Cristiana Nador and Marko Matosović and Alexandros Flamos and Niki-artemis Spyridaki and Balzan, {Mario V.} and Orsolya F{\"u}l{\"o}p and Stelios Grafakos and Ivan Paspaldzhiev and Oliver Heidrich",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.014",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "948--959",
journal = "Renewable & sustainable energy reviews",
issn = "1364-0321",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Reckien, D, Salvia, M, Pietrapertosa, F, Simoes, SG, Olazabal, M, De Gregorio Hurtado, S, Geneletti, D, Lorencová, EK, D'alonzo, V, Krook-riekkola, A, Fokaides, PA, Ioannou, BI, Foley, A, Orru, H, Orru, K, Wejs, A, Flacke, J, Church, JM, Feliu, E, Vasilie, S, Nador, C, Matosović, M, Flamos, A, Spyridaki, N, Balzan, MV, Fülöp, O, Grafakos, S, Paspaldzhiev, I & Heidrich, O 2019, 'Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe', Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, vol. 112, pp. 948-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.014

Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe. / Reckien, D.; Salvia, Monica; Pietrapertosa, Filomena; Simoes, Sofia G.; Olazabal, Marta; De Gregorio Hurtado, S.; Geneletti, Davide; Lorencová, Eliška Krkoška; D'alonzo, Valentina; Krook-riekkola, Anna; Fokaides, Paris A.; Ioannou, Byron I.; Foley, Aoife; Orru, Hans; Orru, Kati; Wejs, Anja; Flacke, J.; Church, Jon Marco; Feliu, Efrén; Vasilie, Sergiu; Nador, Cristiana; Matosović, Marko; Flamos, Alexandros; Spyridaki, Niki-artemis; Balzan, Mario V.; Fülöp, Orsolya; Grafakos, Stelios; Paspaldzhiev, Ivan; Heidrich, Oliver.

In: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, Vol. 112, 01.09.2019, p. 948-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe

AU - Reckien, D.

AU - Salvia, Monica

AU - Pietrapertosa, Filomena

AU - Simoes, Sofia G.

AU - Olazabal, Marta

AU - De Gregorio Hurtado, S.

AU - Geneletti, Davide

AU - Lorencová, Eliška Krkoška

AU - D'alonzo, Valentina

AU - Krook-riekkola, Anna

AU - Fokaides, Paris A.

AU - Ioannou, Byron I.

AU - Foley, Aoife

AU - Orru, Hans

AU - Orru, Kati

AU - Wejs, Anja

AU - Flacke, J.

AU - Church, Jon Marco

AU - Feliu, Efrén

AU - Vasilie, Sergiu

AU - Nador, Cristiana

AU - Matosović, Marko

AU - Flamos, Alexandros

AU - Spyridaki, Niki-artemis

AU - Balzan, Mario V.

AU - Fülöp, Orsolya

AU - Grafakos, Stelios

AU - Paspaldzhiev, Ivan

AU - Heidrich, Oliver

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Cities are gaining prominence committing to respond to the threat of climate change, e.g., by developing local climate plans or strategies. However, little is known regarding the approaches and processes of plan development and implementation, or the success and effectiveness of proposed measures. Mainstreaming is regarded as one approach associated with (implementation) success, but the extent of integration of local climate policies and plans in ongoing sectoral and/or development planning is unclear. This paper analyses 885 cities across the 28 European countries to create a first reference baseline on the degree of climate mainstreaming in local climate plans. This will help to compare the benefits of mainstreaming versus dedicated climate plans, looking at policy effectiveness and ultimately delivery of much needed climate change efforts at the city level. All core cities of the European Urban Audit sample were analyzed, and their local climate plans classified as dedicated or mainstreamed in other local policy initiatives. It was found that the degree of mainstreaming is low for mitigation (9% of reviewed cities; 12% of the identified plans) and somewhat higher for adaptation (10% of cities; 29% of plans). In particular horizontal mainstreaming is a major effort for local authorities; an effort that does not necessarily pay off in terms of success of action implementation. This study concludes that climate change issues in local municipalities are best tackled by either, developing a dedicated local climate plan in parallel to a mainstreamed plan or by subsequently developing first the dedicated and later a mainstreaming plan (joint or subsequent “dual track approach”). Cities that currently provide dedicated local climate plans (66% of cities for mitigation; 26% of cities for adaptation) may follow-up with a mainstreaming approach. This promises effective implementation of tangible climate actions as well as subsequent diffusion of climate issues into other local sector policies. The development of only broad sustainability or resilience strategies is seen as critical.

AB - Cities are gaining prominence committing to respond to the threat of climate change, e.g., by developing local climate plans or strategies. However, little is known regarding the approaches and processes of plan development and implementation, or the success and effectiveness of proposed measures. Mainstreaming is regarded as one approach associated with (implementation) success, but the extent of integration of local climate policies and plans in ongoing sectoral and/or development planning is unclear. This paper analyses 885 cities across the 28 European countries to create a first reference baseline on the degree of climate mainstreaming in local climate plans. This will help to compare the benefits of mainstreaming versus dedicated climate plans, looking at policy effectiveness and ultimately delivery of much needed climate change efforts at the city level. All core cities of the European Urban Audit sample were analyzed, and their local climate plans classified as dedicated or mainstreamed in other local policy initiatives. It was found that the degree of mainstreaming is low for mitigation (9% of reviewed cities; 12% of the identified plans) and somewhat higher for adaptation (10% of cities; 29% of plans). In particular horizontal mainstreaming is a major effort for local authorities; an effort that does not necessarily pay off in terms of success of action implementation. This study concludes that climate change issues in local municipalities are best tackled by either, developing a dedicated local climate plan in parallel to a mainstreamed plan or by subsequently developing first the dedicated and later a mainstreaming plan (joint or subsequent “dual track approach”). Cities that currently provide dedicated local climate plans (66% of cities for mitigation; 26% of cities for adaptation) may follow-up with a mainstreaming approach. This promises effective implementation of tangible climate actions as well as subsequent diffusion of climate issues into other local sector policies. The development of only broad sustainability or resilience strategies is seen as critical.

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Mitigation/ adaptation tracking

KW - Europe

KW - Mainstreaming

KW - EU-28

KW - Mitigation

KW - Mitigation/ adaptation stocktaking

KW - Local climate policy/ planning

KW - Urban audit

KW - Monetoring and evaluation (M&E)

KW - Urban areas/ cities

KW - Adaptation

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://library.itc.utwente.nl/login/2019/isi/reckien_ded.pdf

U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.014

DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.014

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 948

EP - 959

JO - Renewable & sustainable energy reviews

JF - Renewable & sustainable energy reviews

SN - 1364-0321

ER -

Reckien D, Salvia M, Pietrapertosa F, Simoes SG, Olazabal M, De Gregorio Hurtado S et al. Dedicated versus mainstreaming approaches in local climate plans in Europe. Renewable & sustainable energy reviews. 2019 Sep 1;112:948-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.014