Degradation of Biomaterials

Noel L. Davison, Florence Barrère-de Groot, Dirk W. Grijpma

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The tissue engineering approach requires suitable biomaterials to serve as three-dimensional scaffolds to support cell growth and differentiation into functional tissues. Depending on the type of tissue in need of repair, a biomaterial must be designed with specific performance criteria in mind. Several excellent books and review articles (e.g., Ratner et al. (2013), Temenoff and Mikos (2008)) on biomaterials have appeared. Essential characteristics of biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering applications are described by Williams (2014). For instance, biomaterials used as load-bearing prostheses for hips and knees should retain their mechanical function for the lifetime of the patient. In large bone defects, where load-bearing is not critical (e.g., the skull), biomaterials—used alone or with cells as tissue engineering constructs—need not be so mechanically strong (Chapter 10). In this case, a degradable biomaterial scaffold would be ideal to allow newly formed bone tissue to gradually take the place of the implanted construct resulting in seamless bone repair and no residual material. In this way, the manner in which the biomaterial is degraded—broken down in the body—is a primary consideration. When a biomaterial is implanted in the body, it is immediately exposed to physiologic fluid and shortly after, cells whose main purpose is to clear it from the host (Chapter 15). Thus, the degradation of biomaterials involves multiple physiologic processes at the same time making it a science to its own. This chapter reviews the degradation mechanisms of the two most established classes of biomaterials—ceramics and polymers—and how these degradation properties can be beneficial in their primary application, bone tissue engineering.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTissue Engineering
EditorsClemens A. van Blitterswijk, Jan de Boer
PublisherAcademic Press
Pages177-215
Edition2
ISBN (Print)978-0-12-420145-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Biocompatible Materials
Tissue Engineering
Bone and Bones
Weight-Bearing
Knee Prosthesis
Hip Prosthesis
Skull
Cell Differentiation
Growth

Keywords

  • METIS-315315
  • IR-99659

Cite this

Davison, N. L., Barrère-de Groot, F., & Grijpma, D. W. (2015). Degradation of Biomaterials. In C. A. van Blitterswijk, & J. de Boer (Eds.), Tissue Engineering (2 ed., pp. 177-215). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00006-7
Davison, Noel L. ; Barrère-de Groot, Florence ; Grijpma, Dirk W. / Degradation of Biomaterials. Tissue Engineering. editor / Clemens A. van Blitterswijk ; Jan de Boer. 2. ed. Academic Press, 2015. pp. 177-215
@inbook{b23e056fd24741bd9a6871fa6afe113a,
title = "Degradation of Biomaterials",
abstract = "The tissue engineering approach requires suitable biomaterials to serve as three-dimensional scaffolds to support cell growth and differentiation into functional tissues. Depending on the type of tissue in need of repair, a biomaterial must be designed with specific performance criteria in mind. Several excellent books and review articles (e.g., Ratner et al. (2013), Temenoff and Mikos (2008)) on biomaterials have appeared. Essential characteristics of biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering applications are described by Williams (2014). For instance, biomaterials used as load-bearing prostheses for hips and knees should retain their mechanical function for the lifetime of the patient. In large bone defects, where load-bearing is not critical (e.g., the skull), biomaterials—used alone or with cells as tissue engineering constructs—need not be so mechanically strong (Chapter 10). In this case, a degradable biomaterial scaffold would be ideal to allow newly formed bone tissue to gradually take the place of the implanted construct resulting in seamless bone repair and no residual material. In this way, the manner in which the biomaterial is degraded—broken down in the body—is a primary consideration. When a biomaterial is implanted in the body, it is immediately exposed to physiologic fluid and shortly after, cells whose main purpose is to clear it from the host (Chapter 15). Thus, the degradation of biomaterials involves multiple physiologic processes at the same time making it a science to its own. This chapter reviews the degradation mechanisms of the two most established classes of biomaterials—ceramics and polymers—and how these degradation properties can be beneficial in their primary application, bone tissue engineering.",
keywords = "METIS-315315, IR-99659",
author = "Davison, {Noel L.} and {Barr{\`e}re-de Groot}, Florence and Grijpma, {Dirk W.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00006-7",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-12-420145-3",
pages = "177--215",
editor = "{van Blitterswijk}, {Clemens A.} and {de Boer}, Jan",
booktitle = "Tissue Engineering",
publisher = "Academic Press",
edition = "2",

}

Davison, NL, Barrère-de Groot, F & Grijpma, DW 2015, Degradation of Biomaterials. in CA van Blitterswijk & J de Boer (eds), Tissue Engineering. 2 edn, Academic Press, pp. 177-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00006-7

Degradation of Biomaterials. / Davison, Noel L.; Barrère-de Groot, Florence; Grijpma, Dirk W.

Tissue Engineering. ed. / Clemens A. van Blitterswijk; Jan de Boer. 2. ed. Academic Press, 2015. p. 177-215.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Degradation of Biomaterials

AU - Davison, Noel L.

AU - Barrère-de Groot, Florence

AU - Grijpma, Dirk W.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The tissue engineering approach requires suitable biomaterials to serve as three-dimensional scaffolds to support cell growth and differentiation into functional tissues. Depending on the type of tissue in need of repair, a biomaterial must be designed with specific performance criteria in mind. Several excellent books and review articles (e.g., Ratner et al. (2013), Temenoff and Mikos (2008)) on biomaterials have appeared. Essential characteristics of biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering applications are described by Williams (2014). For instance, biomaterials used as load-bearing prostheses for hips and knees should retain their mechanical function for the lifetime of the patient. In large bone defects, where load-bearing is not critical (e.g., the skull), biomaterials—used alone or with cells as tissue engineering constructs—need not be so mechanically strong (Chapter 10). In this case, a degradable biomaterial scaffold would be ideal to allow newly formed bone tissue to gradually take the place of the implanted construct resulting in seamless bone repair and no residual material. In this way, the manner in which the biomaterial is degraded—broken down in the body—is a primary consideration. When a biomaterial is implanted in the body, it is immediately exposed to physiologic fluid and shortly after, cells whose main purpose is to clear it from the host (Chapter 15). Thus, the degradation of biomaterials involves multiple physiologic processes at the same time making it a science to its own. This chapter reviews the degradation mechanisms of the two most established classes of biomaterials—ceramics and polymers—and how these degradation properties can be beneficial in their primary application, bone tissue engineering.

AB - The tissue engineering approach requires suitable biomaterials to serve as three-dimensional scaffolds to support cell growth and differentiation into functional tissues. Depending on the type of tissue in need of repair, a biomaterial must be designed with specific performance criteria in mind. Several excellent books and review articles (e.g., Ratner et al. (2013), Temenoff and Mikos (2008)) on biomaterials have appeared. Essential characteristics of biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering applications are described by Williams (2014). For instance, biomaterials used as load-bearing prostheses for hips and knees should retain their mechanical function for the lifetime of the patient. In large bone defects, where load-bearing is not critical (e.g., the skull), biomaterials—used alone or with cells as tissue engineering constructs—need not be so mechanically strong (Chapter 10). In this case, a degradable biomaterial scaffold would be ideal to allow newly formed bone tissue to gradually take the place of the implanted construct resulting in seamless bone repair and no residual material. In this way, the manner in which the biomaterial is degraded—broken down in the body—is a primary consideration. When a biomaterial is implanted in the body, it is immediately exposed to physiologic fluid and shortly after, cells whose main purpose is to clear it from the host (Chapter 15). Thus, the degradation of biomaterials involves multiple physiologic processes at the same time making it a science to its own. This chapter reviews the degradation mechanisms of the two most established classes of biomaterials—ceramics and polymers—and how these degradation properties can be beneficial in their primary application, bone tissue engineering.

KW - METIS-315315

KW - IR-99659

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00006-7

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00006-7

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-0-12-420145-3

SP - 177

EP - 215

BT - Tissue Engineering

A2 - van Blitterswijk, Clemens A.

A2 - de Boer, Jan

PB - Academic Press

ER -

Davison NL, Barrère-de Groot F, Grijpma DW. Degradation of Biomaterials. In van Blitterswijk CA, de Boer J, editors, Tissue Engineering. 2 ed. Academic Press. 2015. p. 177-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00006-7