Delivery Strategies for Skin: Comparison of Nanoliter Jets, Needles and Topical Solutions

Katharina Cu, Ruchi Bansal, Samir Mitragotri, David Fernandez Rivas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Drug diffusion within the skin with a needle-free micro-jet injection (NFI) device was compared with two well-established delivery methods: topical application and solid needle injection. A permanent make-up (PMU) machine, normally used for dermal pigmentation, was utilized as a solid needle injection method. For NFIs a continuous wave (CW) laser diode was used to create a bubble inside a microfluidic device containing a light absorbing solution. Each method delivered two different solutions into ex vivo porcine skin. The first solution consisted of a red dye (direct red 81) and rhodamine B in water. The second solution was direct red 81 and rhodamine B in water and glycerol. We measured the diffusion depth, width and surface area of the solutions in all the injected skin samples. The NFI has a higher vertical dispersion velocity of 3 × 10 5μm/s compared to topical (0.1 μm/s) and needle injection (53 μm/s). The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed, and we conclude that the micro-jet injector represents a fast and minimally invasive injection method, while the solid needle injector causes notable tissue damage. In contrast, the topical method had the slowest diffusion rate but causes no visible damage to the skin.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of biomedical engineering
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 15 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Needles
Skin
Continuous wave lasers
Glycerol
Microfluidics
Semiconductor lasers
Water
Dyes
Tissue

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Needle-free injection
  • Thermocavitation
  • Transdermal delivery
  • Solid needle injection
  • Topical application
  • Laser micro-jet

Cite this

@article{ab5e84dc84484ec5becc5c120cc74223,
title = "Delivery Strategies for Skin: Comparison of Nanoliter Jets, Needles and Topical Solutions",
abstract = "Drug diffusion within the skin with a needle-free micro-jet injection (NFI) device was compared with two well-established delivery methods: topical application and solid needle injection. A permanent make-up (PMU) machine, normally used for dermal pigmentation, was utilized as a solid needle injection method. For NFIs a continuous wave (CW) laser diode was used to create a bubble inside a microfluidic device containing a light absorbing solution. Each method delivered two different solutions into ex vivo porcine skin. The first solution consisted of a red dye (direct red 81) and rhodamine B in water. The second solution was direct red 81 and rhodamine B in water and glycerol. We measured the diffusion depth, width and surface area of the solutions in all the injected skin samples. The NFI has a higher vertical dispersion velocity of 3 × 10 5μm/s compared to topical (0.1 μm/s) and needle injection (53 μm/s). The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed, and we conclude that the micro-jet injector represents a fast and minimally invasive injection method, while the solid needle injector causes notable tissue damage. In contrast, the topical method had the slowest diffusion rate but causes no visible damage to the skin.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Needle-free injection, Thermocavitation, Transdermal delivery, Solid needle injection, Topical application, Laser micro-jet",
author = "Katharina Cu and Ruchi Bansal and Samir Mitragotri and {Fernandez Rivas}, David",
note = "Springer deal",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10439-019-02383-1",
language = "English",
journal = "Annals of biomedical engineering",
issn = "0090-6964",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Delivery Strategies for Skin : Comparison of Nanoliter Jets, Needles and Topical Solutions. / Cu, Katharina; Bansal, Ruchi; Mitragotri, Samir; Fernandez Rivas, David .

In: Annals of biomedical engineering, 15.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delivery Strategies for Skin

T2 - Comparison of Nanoliter Jets, Needles and Topical Solutions

AU - Cu, Katharina

AU - Bansal, Ruchi

AU - Mitragotri, Samir

AU - Fernandez Rivas, David

N1 - Springer deal

PY - 2019/10/15

Y1 - 2019/10/15

N2 - Drug diffusion within the skin with a needle-free micro-jet injection (NFI) device was compared with two well-established delivery methods: topical application and solid needle injection. A permanent make-up (PMU) machine, normally used for dermal pigmentation, was utilized as a solid needle injection method. For NFIs a continuous wave (CW) laser diode was used to create a bubble inside a microfluidic device containing a light absorbing solution. Each method delivered two different solutions into ex vivo porcine skin. The first solution consisted of a red dye (direct red 81) and rhodamine B in water. The second solution was direct red 81 and rhodamine B in water and glycerol. We measured the diffusion depth, width and surface area of the solutions in all the injected skin samples. The NFI has a higher vertical dispersion velocity of 3 × 10 5μm/s compared to topical (0.1 μm/s) and needle injection (53 μm/s). The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed, and we conclude that the micro-jet injector represents a fast and minimally invasive injection method, while the solid needle injector causes notable tissue damage. In contrast, the topical method had the slowest diffusion rate but causes no visible damage to the skin.

AB - Drug diffusion within the skin with a needle-free micro-jet injection (NFI) device was compared with two well-established delivery methods: topical application and solid needle injection. A permanent make-up (PMU) machine, normally used for dermal pigmentation, was utilized as a solid needle injection method. For NFIs a continuous wave (CW) laser diode was used to create a bubble inside a microfluidic device containing a light absorbing solution. Each method delivered two different solutions into ex vivo porcine skin. The first solution consisted of a red dye (direct red 81) and rhodamine B in water. The second solution was direct red 81 and rhodamine B in water and glycerol. We measured the diffusion depth, width and surface area of the solutions in all the injected skin samples. The NFI has a higher vertical dispersion velocity of 3 × 10 5μm/s compared to topical (0.1 μm/s) and needle injection (53 μm/s). The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed, and we conclude that the micro-jet injector represents a fast and minimally invasive injection method, while the solid needle injector causes notable tissue damage. In contrast, the topical method had the slowest diffusion rate but causes no visible damage to the skin.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Needle-free injection

KW - Thermocavitation

KW - Transdermal delivery

KW - Solid needle injection

KW - Topical application

KW - Laser micro-jet

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074021979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10439-019-02383-1

DO - 10.1007/s10439-019-02383-1

M3 - Article

JO - Annals of biomedical engineering

JF - Annals of biomedical engineering

SN - 0090-6964

ER -