Abstract
| Language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | PowerTech, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven |
| Place of Publication | USA |
| Publisher | IEEE Power & Energy Society |
| Pages | 457759:1-457759:6 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISBN (Print) | not assigned |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Jun 2015 |
Publication series
| Name | |
|---|---|
| Publisher | IEEE Power & Energy Society |
Keywords
- EWI-26247
- METIS-312706
- IR-97136
Cite this
}
Demand side management using profile steering. / Gerards, Marco Egbertus Theodorus; Toersche, Hermen; Hoogsteen, Gerwin; van der Klauw, Thijs; Hurink, Johann L.; Smit, Gerardus Johannes Maria.
PowerTech, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven. USA : IEEE Power & Energy Society, 2015. p. 457759:1-457759:6.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review
TY - GEN
T1 - Demand side management using profile steering
AU - Gerards, Marco Egbertus Theodorus
AU - Toersche, Hermen
AU - Hoogsteen, Gerwin
AU - van der Klauw, Thijs
AU - Hurink, Johann L.
AU - Smit, Gerardus Johannes Maria
N1 - 10.1109/PTC.2015.7232328
PY - 2015/6/29
Y1 - 2015/6/29
N2 - Many Demand Side Management (DSM) approaches use energy prices as steering signals. This paper shows that such steering signals may result in power quality problems and high losses. As an alternative, this paper proposes to use desired (e.g., flat) power profiles as steering signals and presents an efficient scheduling algorithm that can follow desired power profiles. This paper investigates the complexity of price and profile steering, and presents an algorithm for profile steering. The evaluation of this algorithm studies the results of a best possible uniform pricing and profile steering for a case of 121 houses, each with an electrical vehicle of which the power consumption can be controlled and shifted in time. In contrast to the other evaluated approaches, our profile steering algorithm results in a much flatter profile and keeps the voltage between 220 V and 235 V at each node. It reduces distribution losses by 57% compared to no control, and by 48% compared to uniform pricing.
AB - Many Demand Side Management (DSM) approaches use energy prices as steering signals. This paper shows that such steering signals may result in power quality problems and high losses. As an alternative, this paper proposes to use desired (e.g., flat) power profiles as steering signals and presents an efficient scheduling algorithm that can follow desired power profiles. This paper investigates the complexity of price and profile steering, and presents an algorithm for profile steering. The evaluation of this algorithm studies the results of a best possible uniform pricing and profile steering for a case of 121 houses, each with an electrical vehicle of which the power consumption can be controlled and shifted in time. In contrast to the other evaluated approaches, our profile steering algorithm results in a much flatter profile and keeps the voltage between 220 V and 235 V at each node. It reduces distribution losses by 57% compared to no control, and by 48% compared to uniform pricing.
KW - EWI-26247
KW - METIS-312706
KW - IR-97136
U2 - 10.1109/PTC.2015.7232328
DO - 10.1109/PTC.2015.7232328
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - not assigned
SP - 457759:1-457759:6
BT - PowerTech, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven
PB - IEEE Power & Energy Society
CY - USA
ER -