TY - GEN
T1 - Design + Ethics
T2 - How is it more than the sum of its parts?
AU - Ozkaramanli - Leerkes, Deger
AU - Nagenborg, Michael H.
AU - van Ditmar, Delfina Fantini
AU - Lehtinen, Sanna
AU - Schwobel-Patel, Christine
AU - Ferrarello, Laura
N1 - Ozkaramanli, D., Nagenborg, M., Fantini van Ditmar, D., Lehtinen, S., Schwobel-Patel, C., and Ferrarello, L. (2022) Design + Ethics: How is it more than the sum of its parts?, in Lockton, D., Lenzi, S., Hekkert, P., Oak, A., Sádaba, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.), DRS2022: Bilbao, 27 June - 3 July, Bilbao, Spain. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.921
PY - 2022/11/25
Y1 - 2022/11/25
N2 - The discussion of ethics in design has so far relied on theories and approaches from other disciplines. We argue that design can benefit from an explicit discussion on the ethics of its methods and practices that arises from within the discipline. This Conversation aimed at stimulating this discussion. Around 25 people attended in person, in addition to the online participants. We asked our audience about the main approaches they use for ethical inquiry and discussed the opportunities and challenges of applying these. We found out that ethics may best be framed as an invitation to care, without reducing it to a checklist, toolkit or an afterthought that can be added onto the design process. Although the situated nature of ethical issues calls for a plurality of approaches, we foresee boundaries to pluralism that acknowledge historical legacies of violence. Hence, we see a role for design to willingly engage with problematizing (vs. problem-solving) when addressing societal issues, with a view towards structural injustices.
AB - The discussion of ethics in design has so far relied on theories and approaches from other disciplines. We argue that design can benefit from an explicit discussion on the ethics of its methods and practices that arises from within the discipline. This Conversation aimed at stimulating this discussion. Around 25 people attended in person, in addition to the online participants. We asked our audience about the main approaches they use for ethical inquiry and discussed the opportunities and challenges of applying these. We found out that ethics may best be framed as an invitation to care, without reducing it to a checklist, toolkit or an afterthought that can be added onto the design process. Although the situated nature of ethical issues calls for a plurality of approaches, we foresee boundaries to pluralism that acknowledge historical legacies of violence. Hence, we see a role for design to willingly engage with problematizing (vs. problem-solving) when addressing societal issues, with a view towards structural injustices.
KW - design ethics
KW - interdisciplinary research
KW - practice-based research
KW - design education
UR - https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2022/conversations/11/
U2 - 10.21606/drs.2022.921
DO - 10.21606/drs.2022.921
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - DRS Biennial Conference Series
BT - DRS2022: Bilbao
A2 - Lockton, D.
A2 - Lenzi, S.
A2 - Hekkert, P.
A2 - Oak, A.
A2 - Sádaba, J.
A2 - Lloyd, P.
PB - Design Research Society
ER -