Designing a good life: The matrix for the technological mediation of morality

Tsjalling Swierstra, Katinka Waelbers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    35 Citations (Scopus)
    17 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Technologies fulfill a social role in the sense that they influence the moral actions of people, often in unintended and unforeseen ways. Scientists and engineers are already accepting much responsibility for the technological, economical and environmental aspects of their work. This article asks them to take an extra step, and now also consider the social role of their products. The aim is to enable engineers to take a prospective responsibility for the future social roles of their technologies by providing them with a matrix that helps to explore in advance how emerging technologies might plausibly affect the reasons behind people’s (moral) actions. On the horizontal axis of the matrix, we distinguished the three basic types of reasons that play a role in practical judgment: what is the case, what can be done and what should be done. On the vertical axis we distinguished the morally relevant classes of issues: stakeholders, consequences and the good life. To illustrate how this matrix may work in practice, the final section applies the matrix to the case of the Google PowerMeter.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)157–172
    JournalScience and engineering ethics
    Volume18
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • Responsibility
    • Mediation
    • Technology
    • NEST ethics
    • Techno-moral change

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Designing a good life: The matrix for the technological mediation of morality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this