Designing and assessing a course on prioritization and importance assessment in strategic non-routine requirements engineering processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this contribution, we present a course for making stakeholders in requirements engineering (RE) processes aware of the relevance of importance assessment (the thinking process that they go through while assessing requirement weights) and giving them some experience with specific aspects of the importance assessment process. We also analyze the experiences of the participants in five pilot sessions. In RE instruments, elicitation of requirement weights receives much attention. However, the processes that individual stakeholders go through while assessing weights are largely ignored or seen as a ‘black box’. In the course, participants gain experience with some common issues and pitfalls in assessing weights. Issues covered are: completeness and interdependence of requirements, causal relationships and the common denominator, handling ‘irrational’ requirements, and the meaning of ‘importance’ (priority). The course was given in various large organizations in the aerospace sector, and data on participants’ experiences were gathered by means of a standardized questionnaire. The extent to which the participants claimed they learned about the relevance of importance assessment and about how to perform it were, respectively, 2.89 and 2.72 on a scale from 1 to 5. The relevance of the various assignments was rated between 3.74 and 4.00 on a 1–5 scale. Our study indicates that the course, or elements of it, should be embedded in an organization’s work practices in order to achieve lasting effects
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-520
JournalRequirements engineering
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Requirements engineering

Keywords

  • METIS-310880
  • IR-96284

Cite this

@article{b4677f31cfc04744956cd3016b5512bd,
title = "Designing and assessing a course on prioritization and importance assessment in strategic non-routine requirements engineering processes",
abstract = "In this contribution, we present a course for making stakeholders in requirements engineering (RE) processes aware of the relevance of importance assessment (the thinking process that they go through while assessing requirement weights) and giving them some experience with specific aspects of the importance assessment process. We also analyze the experiences of the participants in five pilot sessions. In RE instruments, elicitation of requirement weights receives much attention. However, the processes that individual stakeholders go through while assessing weights are largely ignored or seen as a ‘black box’. In the course, participants gain experience with some common issues and pitfalls in assessing weights. Issues covered are: completeness and interdependence of requirements, causal relationships and the common denominator, handling ‘irrational’ requirements, and the meaning of ‘importance’ (priority). The course was given in various large organizations in the aerospace sector, and data on participants’ experiences were gathered by means of a standardized questionnaire. The extent to which the participants claimed they learned about the relevance of importance assessment and about how to perform it were, respectively, 2.89 and 2.72 on a scale from 1 to 5. The relevance of the various assignments was rated between 3.74 and 4.00 on a 1–5 scale. Our study indicates that the course, or elements of it, should be embedded in an organization’s work practices in order to achieve lasting effects",
keywords = "METIS-310880, IR-96284",
author = "Heerkens, {Johannes M.G.} and {van der Wegen}, {Leonardus L.M.} and {van der Heijden}, Beatrice",
note = "Open access",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s00766-015-0230-6",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "505--520",
journal = "Requirements engineering",
issn = "0947-3602",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Designing and assessing a course on prioritization and importance assessment in strategic non-routine requirements engineering processes. / Heerkens, Johannes M.G.; van der Wegen, Leonardus L.M.; van der Heijden, Beatrice.

In: Requirements engineering, Vol. 21, No. 4, 06.06.2016, p. 505-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing and assessing a course on prioritization and importance assessment in strategic non-routine requirements engineering processes

AU - Heerkens, Johannes M.G.

AU - van der Wegen, Leonardus L.M.

AU - van der Heijden, Beatrice

N1 - Open access

PY - 2016/6/6

Y1 - 2016/6/6

N2 - In this contribution, we present a course for making stakeholders in requirements engineering (RE) processes aware of the relevance of importance assessment (the thinking process that they go through while assessing requirement weights) and giving them some experience with specific aspects of the importance assessment process. We also analyze the experiences of the participants in five pilot sessions. In RE instruments, elicitation of requirement weights receives much attention. However, the processes that individual stakeholders go through while assessing weights are largely ignored or seen as a ‘black box’. In the course, participants gain experience with some common issues and pitfalls in assessing weights. Issues covered are: completeness and interdependence of requirements, causal relationships and the common denominator, handling ‘irrational’ requirements, and the meaning of ‘importance’ (priority). The course was given in various large organizations in the aerospace sector, and data on participants’ experiences were gathered by means of a standardized questionnaire. The extent to which the participants claimed they learned about the relevance of importance assessment and about how to perform it were, respectively, 2.89 and 2.72 on a scale from 1 to 5. The relevance of the various assignments was rated between 3.74 and 4.00 on a 1–5 scale. Our study indicates that the course, or elements of it, should be embedded in an organization’s work practices in order to achieve lasting effects

AB - In this contribution, we present a course for making stakeholders in requirements engineering (RE) processes aware of the relevance of importance assessment (the thinking process that they go through while assessing requirement weights) and giving them some experience with specific aspects of the importance assessment process. We also analyze the experiences of the participants in five pilot sessions. In RE instruments, elicitation of requirement weights receives much attention. However, the processes that individual stakeholders go through while assessing weights are largely ignored or seen as a ‘black box’. In the course, participants gain experience with some common issues and pitfalls in assessing weights. Issues covered are: completeness and interdependence of requirements, causal relationships and the common denominator, handling ‘irrational’ requirements, and the meaning of ‘importance’ (priority). The course was given in various large organizations in the aerospace sector, and data on participants’ experiences were gathered by means of a standardized questionnaire. The extent to which the participants claimed they learned about the relevance of importance assessment and about how to perform it were, respectively, 2.89 and 2.72 on a scale from 1 to 5. The relevance of the various assignments was rated between 3.74 and 4.00 on a 1–5 scale. Our study indicates that the course, or elements of it, should be embedded in an organization’s work practices in order to achieve lasting effects

KW - METIS-310880

KW - IR-96284

U2 - 10.1007/s00766-015-0230-6

DO - 10.1007/s00766-015-0230-6

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 505

EP - 520

JO - Requirements engineering

JF - Requirements engineering

SN - 0947-3602

IS - 4

ER -