Detection of forest canopy gaps from very high resolution aerial images

Beryl B. Nyamgeroh, Thomas A. Groen (Corresponding Author), Michael J.C. Weir, Petar Dimov, Tzvetan Zlatanov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Europe, assessment of the ecological function of forests is increasingly important as evidenced by Natura 2000, which has seen the establishment of protected sites that are of ecological importance. The presence of canopy gaps has proved to be a useful indicator of the forest structure and biodiversity in these areas.
Two methods – Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) and Image Texture Based Analysis (ITBA) – were assessed to detect and quantify canopy gaps and to investigate the influence of forest type on their performance. The research was undertaken in two Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria. To estimate the gap fractions in the field, 100 square plots (150m by 150 m) were established. Within each plot, 25 circular sub-plots were laid out in a regular pattern. Gap size within each sub-plot was estimated visually.
The methods were assessed using very high-resolution (0.13m ground resolution) aerial imagery. For the OBIA method, five parameter settings were tested and the gap fractions estimated on the imagery and compared with the field estimates. Likewise, for the ITBA method, five different settings were tested. In general, both methods overestimated canopy gap fraction relative to the field-based estimates, especially where the gap fractions were relatively small. Larger gaps were more accurately estimated by the OBIA method. Neither method performed well in broadleaved forest. Statistical comparison showed that, overall, the correlations of the estimates from the imagery with field data are only moderate and that there is no significant difference between the two methods.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)629-636
Number of pages8
JournalEcological indicators
Volume95
Issue numberpart 1
Early online date11 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

canopy gap
canopy gaps
forest canopy
image analysis
imagery
methodology
texture
method
detection
ecological function
Bulgaria
forest types
biodiversity

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

Nyamgeroh, Beryl B. ; Groen, Thomas A. ; Weir, Michael J.C. ; Dimov, Petar ; Zlatanov, Tzvetan. / Detection of forest canopy gaps from very high resolution aerial images. In: Ecological indicators. 2018 ; Vol. 95, No. part 1. pp. 629-636.
@article{1d89a59dc2e1475db3810f857e3381f4,
title = "Detection of forest canopy gaps from very high resolution aerial images",
abstract = "In Europe, assessment of the ecological function of forests is increasingly important as evidenced by Natura 2000, which has seen the establishment of protected sites that are of ecological importance. The presence of canopy gaps has proved to be a useful indicator of the forest structure and biodiversity in these areas.Two methods – Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) and Image Texture Based Analysis (ITBA) – were assessed to detect and quantify canopy gaps and to investigate the influence of forest type on their performance. The research was undertaken in two Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria. To estimate the gap fractions in the field, 100 square plots (150m by 150 m) were established. Within each plot, 25 circular sub-plots were laid out in a regular pattern. Gap size within each sub-plot was estimated visually.The methods were assessed using very high-resolution (0.13m ground resolution) aerial imagery. For the OBIA method, five parameter settings were tested and the gap fractions estimated on the imagery and compared with the field estimates. Likewise, for the ITBA method, five different settings were tested. In general, both methods overestimated canopy gap fraction relative to the field-based estimates, especially where the gap fractions were relatively small. Larger gaps were more accurately estimated by the OBIA method. Neither method performed well in broadleaved forest. Statistical comparison showed that, overall, the correlations of the estimates from the imagery with field data are only moderate and that there is no significant difference between the two methods.",
keywords = "ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "Nyamgeroh, {Beryl B.} and Groen, {Thomas A.} and Weir, {Michael J.C.} and Petar Dimov and Tzvetan Zlatanov",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.011",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "629--636",
journal = "Ecological indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "part 1",

}

Detection of forest canopy gaps from very high resolution aerial images. / Nyamgeroh, Beryl B.; Groen, Thomas A. (Corresponding Author); Weir, Michael J.C.; Dimov, Petar; Zlatanov, Tzvetan.

In: Ecological indicators, Vol. 95, No. part 1, 12.2018, p. 629-636.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of forest canopy gaps from very high resolution aerial images

AU - Nyamgeroh, Beryl B.

AU - Groen, Thomas A.

AU - Weir, Michael J.C.

AU - Dimov, Petar

AU - Zlatanov, Tzvetan

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - In Europe, assessment of the ecological function of forests is increasingly important as evidenced by Natura 2000, which has seen the establishment of protected sites that are of ecological importance. The presence of canopy gaps has proved to be a useful indicator of the forest structure and biodiversity in these areas.Two methods – Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) and Image Texture Based Analysis (ITBA) – were assessed to detect and quantify canopy gaps and to investigate the influence of forest type on their performance. The research was undertaken in two Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria. To estimate the gap fractions in the field, 100 square plots (150m by 150 m) were established. Within each plot, 25 circular sub-plots were laid out in a regular pattern. Gap size within each sub-plot was estimated visually.The methods were assessed using very high-resolution (0.13m ground resolution) aerial imagery. For the OBIA method, five parameter settings were tested and the gap fractions estimated on the imagery and compared with the field estimates. Likewise, for the ITBA method, five different settings were tested. In general, both methods overestimated canopy gap fraction relative to the field-based estimates, especially where the gap fractions were relatively small. Larger gaps were more accurately estimated by the OBIA method. Neither method performed well in broadleaved forest. Statistical comparison showed that, overall, the correlations of the estimates from the imagery with field data are only moderate and that there is no significant difference between the two methods.

AB - In Europe, assessment of the ecological function of forests is increasingly important as evidenced by Natura 2000, which has seen the establishment of protected sites that are of ecological importance. The presence of canopy gaps has proved to be a useful indicator of the forest structure and biodiversity in these areas.Two methods – Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) and Image Texture Based Analysis (ITBA) – were assessed to detect and quantify canopy gaps and to investigate the influence of forest type on their performance. The research was undertaken in two Natura 2000 sites in Bulgaria. To estimate the gap fractions in the field, 100 square plots (150m by 150 m) were established. Within each plot, 25 circular sub-plots were laid out in a regular pattern. Gap size within each sub-plot was estimated visually.The methods were assessed using very high-resolution (0.13m ground resolution) aerial imagery. For the OBIA method, five parameter settings were tested and the gap fractions estimated on the imagery and compared with the field estimates. Likewise, for the ITBA method, five different settings were tested. In general, both methods overestimated canopy gap fraction relative to the field-based estimates, especially where the gap fractions were relatively small. Larger gaps were more accurately estimated by the OBIA method. Neither method performed well in broadleaved forest. Statistical comparison showed that, overall, the correlations of the estimates from the imagery with field data are only moderate and that there is no significant difference between the two methods.

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.011

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2018/isi/groen_det.pdf

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.011

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 629

EP - 636

JO - Ecological indicators

JF - Ecological indicators

SN - 1470-160X

IS - part 1

ER -