TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography
T2 - Effect of pixel size
AU - Suryanarayanan, Sankararaman
AU - Karellas, Andrew
AU - Vedantham, Srinivasan
AU - Sechopoulos, Ioannis
AU - D'Orsi, Carl J.
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of pixel size on the detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography. Materials and Methods: A high-spatial-resolution prototype imager that yields variable pixel size (39 and 78 μm) and a clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system that yields a 100-μm pixel size were used. Radiographic images of a contrast-detail (CD) phantom were obtained to perform four-alternative forced-choice observer experiments. Polymethylmethacrylate was added to obtain phantom thicknesses of 45 and 58 mm, which are typical breast thicknesses encountered in mammography. Phantom images were acquired with both systems under nearly identical exposure conditions by using an antiscatter grid. Twelve images were acquired for each phantom thickness and pixel size (for a total of 72 images), and six observers participated in this study. Observer responses were used to compute the fraction of correctly detected disks. A signal detection model was used to fit the recorded data from which CD characteristics were obtained. Repeated-measures analyses with mixed-effects linear models were performed for each of the six observers. All statistical tests were two sided and unadjusted for multiple comparisons. A P value of .05 or less was considered to indicate it significant difference. Results: Statistical analysis revealed significantly better CD characteristics with 39- and 78-μm pixel sizes compared with 100-μm pixel size for all disk diameters and phantom thicknesses (P < .001). Increase in phantom thickness degraded CD characteristics regardless of pixel size (P < .001). Conclusion: On the basis of the conditions of this study, reducing pixel size below 100 μm with low imaging system noise enhances the visual perception of small objects that correspond to typical microcalcifications.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of pixel size on the detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography. Materials and Methods: A high-spatial-resolution prototype imager that yields variable pixel size (39 and 78 μm) and a clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system that yields a 100-μm pixel size were used. Radiographic images of a contrast-detail (CD) phantom were obtained to perform four-alternative forced-choice observer experiments. Polymethylmethacrylate was added to obtain phantom thicknesses of 45 and 58 mm, which are typical breast thicknesses encountered in mammography. Phantom images were acquired with both systems under nearly identical exposure conditions by using an antiscatter grid. Twelve images were acquired for each phantom thickness and pixel size (for a total of 72 images), and six observers participated in this study. Observer responses were used to compute the fraction of correctly detected disks. A signal detection model was used to fit the recorded data from which CD characteristics were obtained. Repeated-measures analyses with mixed-effects linear models were performed for each of the six observers. All statistical tests were two sided and unadjusted for multiple comparisons. A P value of .05 or less was considered to indicate it significant difference. Results: Statistical analysis revealed significantly better CD characteristics with 39- and 78-μm pixel sizes compared with 100-μm pixel size for all disk diameters and phantom thicknesses (P < .001). Increase in phantom thickness degraded CD characteristics regardless of pixel size (P < .001). Conclusion: On the basis of the conditions of this study, reducing pixel size below 100 μm with low imaging system noise enhances the visual perception of small objects that correspond to typical microcalcifications.
KW - NLA
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250902518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2441060977
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2441060977
M3 - Article
C2 - 17522348
AN - SCOPUS:34250902518
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 244
SP - 130
EP - 137
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 1
ER -