Determinants of Internet skills, use and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, several digital divide scholars suggested that a shift is needed from a focus on binary Internet access (first-level digital divide) and Internet skills and use (second-level digital divide) to a third-level digital divide in which the tangible outcomes of Internet use are highlighted. A plethora of studies have been conducted to identify determinants of digital divides. Unfortunately, there is a lack of consistency in the terminology used. Moreover, terms are often not theoretically grounded. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of digital divide determinants. The results show that the third-level digital divide was underexposed. The primary focus is on Internet use. More importantly, the identified determinants show that digital divide research is largely limited to sociodemographic and socioeconomic determinants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1607-1624
JournalTelematics and informatics
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

digital divide
Internet
determinants
Terminology
technical language
lack

Keywords

  • Digital divide
  • Internet outcomes
  • Internet skills
  • Internet use
  • Systematic literature review

Cite this

@article{e0901220fa0e4a16a1495186e1a34826,
title = "Determinants of Internet skills, use and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide",
abstract = "Recently, several digital divide scholars suggested that a shift is needed from a focus on binary Internet access (first-level digital divide) and Internet skills and use (second-level digital divide) to a third-level digital divide in which the tangible outcomes of Internet use are highlighted. A plethora of studies have been conducted to identify determinants of digital divides. Unfortunately, there is a lack of consistency in the terminology used. Moreover, terms are often not theoretically grounded. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of digital divide determinants. The results show that the third-level digital divide was underexposed. The primary focus is on Internet use. More importantly, the identified determinants show that digital divide research is largely limited to sociodemographic and socioeconomic determinants.",
keywords = "Digital divide, Internet outcomes, Internet skills, Internet use, Systematic literature review",
author = "Anique Scheerder and {van Deursen}, Alexander and {van Dijk}, Jan",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1607--1624",
journal = "Telematics and informatics",
issn = "0736-5853",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of Internet skills, use and outcomes

T2 - A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide

AU - Scheerder, Anique

AU - van Deursen, Alexander

AU - van Dijk, Jan

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Recently, several digital divide scholars suggested that a shift is needed from a focus on binary Internet access (first-level digital divide) and Internet skills and use (second-level digital divide) to a third-level digital divide in which the tangible outcomes of Internet use are highlighted. A plethora of studies have been conducted to identify determinants of digital divides. Unfortunately, there is a lack of consistency in the terminology used. Moreover, terms are often not theoretically grounded. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of digital divide determinants. The results show that the third-level digital divide was underexposed. The primary focus is on Internet use. More importantly, the identified determinants show that digital divide research is largely limited to sociodemographic and socioeconomic determinants.

AB - Recently, several digital divide scholars suggested that a shift is needed from a focus on binary Internet access (first-level digital divide) and Internet skills and use (second-level digital divide) to a third-level digital divide in which the tangible outcomes of Internet use are highlighted. A plethora of studies have been conducted to identify determinants of digital divides. Unfortunately, there is a lack of consistency in the terminology used. Moreover, terms are often not theoretically grounded. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of digital divide determinants. The results show that the third-level digital divide was underexposed. The primary focus is on Internet use. More importantly, the identified determinants show that digital divide research is largely limited to sociodemographic and socioeconomic determinants.

KW - Digital divide

KW - Internet outcomes

KW - Internet skills

KW - Internet use

KW - Systematic literature review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026319210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1607

EP - 1624

JO - Telematics and informatics

JF - Telematics and informatics

SN - 0736-5853

IS - 8

ER -