Differentiating act from ideology: evidence from messages for and against violent extremism

S. Prentice, Paul J Taylor, P. Rayson, Ellen Giebels

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)


    Although researchers know a great deal about persuasive messages that encourage terrorism, they know far less about persuasive messages that denounce terrorism and little about how these two sides come together. We propose a conceptualization that distinguishes a message’s support for an act from its support for the ideology underlying an act. Our prediction is tested using corpus-linguistic analysis of 250 counter-extremist messages written by Muslims and U.K. officials and a comparison set of 250 Muslim extremist messages. Consistent with our prediction, Muslim extremist and Muslim counter-messages show disagreement on terrorist actions but agreement in ideological aspects, while U.K. officials’ counter-messages show disagreement with both Muslim extremists’ acts and ideology. Our findings suggest that counter-messages should not be viewed as a homogenous group and that being against violent extremism does not necessarily equate to having positive perceptions of Western values
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)289-306
    JournalNegotiation and conflict management research
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2012


    • METIS-289088
    • IR-82132


    Dive into the research topics of 'Differentiating act from ideology: evidence from messages for and against violent extremism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this