Diversity in school performance feedback systems

Goedele Verhaeghe, Kim Schildkamp, Johannes W. Luyten, Martin Valcke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As data-based decision making is receiving increased attention in education, more and more school performance feedback systems (SPFSs) are being developed and used worldwide. These systems provide schools with data on their functioning. However, little research is available on the characteristics of the different SPFSs. Therefore, this study reflects on the characteristics of SPFSs to provide feedback designers and users arguments for making sound choices in selecting SPFSs with particular characteristics. The results of our study show that the 5 SPFSs selected for the purpose of comparison differ with respect to features related to data gathering and data analysis processes, the content, and the numerical measures and representation modes used. A wide variety can be detected in terms of the complexity and accuracy of data modeling. Users need to be properly informed about the underlying rationale for the features of each SPFS, and on the limitations and strengths of the performance indicators used
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)612-638
JournalSchool effectiveness and school improvement
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

school
performance
data analysis
decision making
education

Keywords

  • METIS-299480
  • IR-88159

Cite this

@article{f7e0e5ef868a4a7396716b31f11cd214,
title = "Diversity in school performance feedback systems",
abstract = "As data-based decision making is receiving increased attention in education, more and more school performance feedback systems (SPFSs) are being developed and used worldwide. These systems provide schools with data on their functioning. However, little research is available on the characteristics of the different SPFSs. Therefore, this study reflects on the characteristics of SPFSs to provide feedback designers and users arguments for making sound choices in selecting SPFSs with particular characteristics. The results of our study show that the 5 SPFSs selected for the purpose of comparison differ with respect to features related to data gathering and data analysis processes, the content, and the numerical measures and representation modes used. A wide variety can be detected in terms of the complexity and accuracy of data modeling. Users need to be properly informed about the underlying rationale for the features of each SPFS, and on the limitations and strengths of the performance indicators used",
keywords = "METIS-299480, IR-88159",
author = "Goedele Verhaeghe and Kim Schildkamp and Luyten, {Johannes W.} and Martin Valcke",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1080/09243453.2015.1017506",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "612--638",
journal = "School effectiveness and school improvement",
issn = "0924-3453",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Diversity in school performance feedback systems. / Verhaeghe, Goedele; Schildkamp, Kim; Luyten, Johannes W.; Valcke, Martin.

In: School effectiveness and school improvement, Vol. 26, No. 4, 26.03.2015, p. 612-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversity in school performance feedback systems

AU - Verhaeghe, Goedele

AU - Schildkamp, Kim

AU - Luyten, Johannes W.

AU - Valcke, Martin

PY - 2015/3/26

Y1 - 2015/3/26

N2 - As data-based decision making is receiving increased attention in education, more and more school performance feedback systems (SPFSs) are being developed and used worldwide. These systems provide schools with data on their functioning. However, little research is available on the characteristics of the different SPFSs. Therefore, this study reflects on the characteristics of SPFSs to provide feedback designers and users arguments for making sound choices in selecting SPFSs with particular characteristics. The results of our study show that the 5 SPFSs selected for the purpose of comparison differ with respect to features related to data gathering and data analysis processes, the content, and the numerical measures and representation modes used. A wide variety can be detected in terms of the complexity and accuracy of data modeling. Users need to be properly informed about the underlying rationale for the features of each SPFS, and on the limitations and strengths of the performance indicators used

AB - As data-based decision making is receiving increased attention in education, more and more school performance feedback systems (SPFSs) are being developed and used worldwide. These systems provide schools with data on their functioning. However, little research is available on the characteristics of the different SPFSs. Therefore, this study reflects on the characteristics of SPFSs to provide feedback designers and users arguments for making sound choices in selecting SPFSs with particular characteristics. The results of our study show that the 5 SPFSs selected for the purpose of comparison differ with respect to features related to data gathering and data analysis processes, the content, and the numerical measures and representation modes used. A wide variety can be detected in terms of the complexity and accuracy of data modeling. Users need to be properly informed about the underlying rationale for the features of each SPFS, and on the limitations and strengths of the performance indicators used

KW - METIS-299480

KW - IR-88159

U2 - 10.1080/09243453.2015.1017506

DO - 10.1080/09243453.2015.1017506

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 612

EP - 638

JO - School effectiveness and school improvement

JF - School effectiveness and school improvement

SN - 0924-3453

IS - 4

ER -