Does instructional approach matter? How elaboration plays a crucial role in multimedia learning.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the affordances of 4 multimedia learning environments for specific learning processes. The environments covered the same domain but used different instructional approaches: (a) hypermedia learning, (b) observational learning, (c) self-explanation-based learning, and (d) inquiry learning. Although they all promote an active attitude, they differ in the specific learning processes they intend to foster. In earlier research (Eysink et al., 2009 ), we found that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning had the highest learning outcomes. In these approaches learners were required to generate (parts of) the subject matter, from which we concluded that they presumably stimulated learners to elaborate. Therefore, in the present study we expected that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning would engage in more learning processes connected to elaboration than would learners involved in hypermedia or observational learning. Forty participants worked through the learning environments while thinking aloud; their protocols were coded using a generic learning processes scheme. Results showed that self-explanation-based learning and inquiry learning led to greater engagement in learning processes in general and more elaborative processes in particular. The results suggest that elaboration is indeed the key process explaining differences in learning across different instructional approaches within multimedia learning environments
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-625
JournalJournal of the learning sciences
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Multimedia
multimedia
Learning
learning
learning process
learning environment
hypermedia
Hypermedia

Cite this

@article{3356dd49c83b4905893a5611a0c955c6,
title = "Does instructional approach matter? How elaboration plays a crucial role in multimedia learning.",
abstract = "This study compared the affordances of 4 multimedia learning environments for specific learning processes. The environments covered the same domain but used different instructional approaches: (a) hypermedia learning, (b) observational learning, (c) self-explanation-based learning, and (d) inquiry learning. Although they all promote an active attitude, they differ in the specific learning processes they intend to foster. In earlier research (Eysink et al., 2009 ), we found that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning had the highest learning outcomes. In these approaches learners were required to generate (parts of) the subject matter, from which we concluded that they presumably stimulated learners to elaborate. Therefore, in the present study we expected that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning would engage in more learning processes connected to elaboration than would learners involved in hypermedia or observational learning. Forty participants worked through the learning environments while thinking aloud; their protocols were coded using a generic learning processes scheme. Results showed that self-explanation-based learning and inquiry learning led to greater engagement in learning processes in general and more elaborative processes in particular. The results suggest that elaboration is indeed the key process explaining differences in learning across different instructional approaches within multimedia learning environments",
author = "Eysink, {Tessa H.S.} and {de Jong}, Ton",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/10508406.2011.611776",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "583--625",
journal = "Journal of the learning sciences",
issn = "1050-8406",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Does instructional approach matter? How elaboration plays a crucial role in multimedia learning. / Eysink, Tessa H.S.; de Jong, Ton.

In: Journal of the learning sciences, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2012, p. 583-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does instructional approach matter? How elaboration plays a crucial role in multimedia learning.

AU - Eysink, Tessa H.S.

AU - de Jong, Ton

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This study compared the affordances of 4 multimedia learning environments for specific learning processes. The environments covered the same domain but used different instructional approaches: (a) hypermedia learning, (b) observational learning, (c) self-explanation-based learning, and (d) inquiry learning. Although they all promote an active attitude, they differ in the specific learning processes they intend to foster. In earlier research (Eysink et al., 2009 ), we found that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning had the highest learning outcomes. In these approaches learners were required to generate (parts of) the subject matter, from which we concluded that they presumably stimulated learners to elaborate. Therefore, in the present study we expected that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning would engage in more learning processes connected to elaboration than would learners involved in hypermedia or observational learning. Forty participants worked through the learning environments while thinking aloud; their protocols were coded using a generic learning processes scheme. Results showed that self-explanation-based learning and inquiry learning led to greater engagement in learning processes in general and more elaborative processes in particular. The results suggest that elaboration is indeed the key process explaining differences in learning across different instructional approaches within multimedia learning environments

AB - This study compared the affordances of 4 multimedia learning environments for specific learning processes. The environments covered the same domain but used different instructional approaches: (a) hypermedia learning, (b) observational learning, (c) self-explanation-based learning, and (d) inquiry learning. Although they all promote an active attitude, they differ in the specific learning processes they intend to foster. In earlier research (Eysink et al., 2009 ), we found that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning had the highest learning outcomes. In these approaches learners were required to generate (parts of) the subject matter, from which we concluded that they presumably stimulated learners to elaborate. Therefore, in the present study we expected that learners involved in self-explanation-based or inquiry learning would engage in more learning processes connected to elaboration than would learners involved in hypermedia or observational learning. Forty participants worked through the learning environments while thinking aloud; their protocols were coded using a generic learning processes scheme. Results showed that self-explanation-based learning and inquiry learning led to greater engagement in learning processes in general and more elaborative processes in particular. The results suggest that elaboration is indeed the key process explaining differences in learning across different instructional approaches within multimedia learning environments

U2 - 10.1080/10508406.2011.611776

DO - 10.1080/10508406.2011.611776

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 583

EP - 625

JO - Journal of the learning sciences

JF - Journal of the learning sciences

SN - 1050-8406

IS - 4

ER -