Does the design matter? Comparing satellite-based indices for insuring pastoralists against drought

Nathaniel Jensen, Quentin Stoeffler, Francesco Fava, A. Vrieling, Clement Atzberger, Michele Meroni, Andrew G. Mude, Michael Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

For those developing satellite-based insurance products, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which of the many available indices most accurately track agro-ecological shocks as experienced by farmers and pastoralists. Furthermore, metrics commonly used by the remote sensing community for assessing the accuracy of indices in retrieving biophysical variables are insufficient in the case of insurance, because they do not consider the value of insurance coverage in terms of household welfare. This study begins to fill this knowledge gap by bridging two index insurance literatures: the remote sensing science literature that focuses on the predictive power of indices, and the economic literature that focuses on welfare outcomes. The article uses a longitudinal panel of household survey data from Kenya to compare the quality of existing and potential insurance products. These products are developed from different processing chains applied to time series of the satellite-based Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Although the indices are highly correlated to each other (ρ > 0.95), a utility analysis provides insight into how small differences can lead to larger differences in product value. Our results highlight that index accuracy, cost, and timeliness of payments must be considered jointly when assessing insurance quality for clients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-73
Number of pages15
JournalEcological economics
Volume162
Early online date3 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

drought
remote sensing
household survey
NDVI
index
Pastoralists
Drought
Insurance
insurance
time series
product
economics
cost
Remote sensing

Keywords

  • index insurance
  • contract design
  • product quality
  • basis risk
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

Jensen, Nathaniel ; Stoeffler, Quentin ; Fava, Francesco ; Vrieling, A. ; Atzberger, Clement ; Meroni, Michele ; Mude, Andrew G. ; Carter, Michael. / Does the design matter? Comparing satellite-based indices for insuring pastoralists against drought. In: Ecological economics. 2019 ; Vol. 162. pp. 59-73.
@article{45442b3993014d4cb5f3e0de1734701a,
title = "Does the design matter? Comparing satellite-based indices for insuring pastoralists against drought",
abstract = "For those developing satellite-based insurance products, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which of the many available indices most accurately track agro-ecological shocks as experienced by farmers and pastoralists. Furthermore, metrics commonly used by the remote sensing community for assessing the accuracy of indices in retrieving biophysical variables are insufficient in the case of insurance, because they do not consider the value of insurance coverage in terms of household welfare. This study begins to fill this knowledge gap by bridging two index insurance literatures: the remote sensing science literature that focuses on the predictive power of indices, and the economic literature that focuses on welfare outcomes. The article uses a longitudinal panel of household survey data from Kenya to compare the quality of existing and potential insurance products. These products are developed from different processing chains applied to time series of the satellite-based Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Although the indices are highly correlated to each other (ρ > 0.95), a utility analysis provides insight into how small differences can lead to larger differences in product value. Our results highlight that index accuracy, cost, and timeliness of payments must be considered jointly when assessing insurance quality for clients.",
keywords = "index insurance, contract design, product quality, basis risk, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "Nathaniel Jensen and Quentin Stoeffler and Francesco Fava and A. Vrieling and Clement Atzberger and Michele Meroni and Mude, {Andrew G.} and Michael Carter",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.014",
language = "English",
volume = "162",
pages = "59--73",
journal = "Ecological economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Does the design matter? Comparing satellite-based indices for insuring pastoralists against drought. / Jensen, Nathaniel; Stoeffler, Quentin; Fava, Francesco; Vrieling, A.; Atzberger, Clement; Meroni, Michele; Mude, Andrew G.; Carter, Michael.

In: Ecological economics, Vol. 162, 01.08.2019, p. 59-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the design matter? Comparing satellite-based indices for insuring pastoralists against drought

AU - Jensen, Nathaniel

AU - Stoeffler, Quentin

AU - Fava, Francesco

AU - Vrieling, A.

AU - Atzberger, Clement

AU - Meroni, Michele

AU - Mude, Andrew G.

AU - Carter, Michael

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - For those developing satellite-based insurance products, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which of the many available indices most accurately track agro-ecological shocks as experienced by farmers and pastoralists. Furthermore, metrics commonly used by the remote sensing community for assessing the accuracy of indices in retrieving biophysical variables are insufficient in the case of insurance, because they do not consider the value of insurance coverage in terms of household welfare. This study begins to fill this knowledge gap by bridging two index insurance literatures: the remote sensing science literature that focuses on the predictive power of indices, and the economic literature that focuses on welfare outcomes. The article uses a longitudinal panel of household survey data from Kenya to compare the quality of existing and potential insurance products. These products are developed from different processing chains applied to time series of the satellite-based Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Although the indices are highly correlated to each other (ρ > 0.95), a utility analysis provides insight into how small differences can lead to larger differences in product value. Our results highlight that index accuracy, cost, and timeliness of payments must be considered jointly when assessing insurance quality for clients.

AB - For those developing satellite-based insurance products, there is no consensus in the scientific community on which of the many available indices most accurately track agro-ecological shocks as experienced by farmers and pastoralists. Furthermore, metrics commonly used by the remote sensing community for assessing the accuracy of indices in retrieving biophysical variables are insufficient in the case of insurance, because they do not consider the value of insurance coverage in terms of household welfare. This study begins to fill this knowledge gap by bridging two index insurance literatures: the remote sensing science literature that focuses on the predictive power of indices, and the economic literature that focuses on welfare outcomes. The article uses a longitudinal panel of household survey data from Kenya to compare the quality of existing and potential insurance products. These products are developed from different processing chains applied to time series of the satellite-based Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Although the indices are highly correlated to each other (ρ > 0.95), a utility analysis provides insight into how small differences can lead to larger differences in product value. Our results highlight that index accuracy, cost, and timeliness of payments must be considered jointly when assessing insurance quality for clients.

KW - index insurance

KW - contract design

KW - product quality

KW - basis risk

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://library.itc.utwente.nl/login/2019/isi/vrieling_does.pdf

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.014

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.014

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 59

EP - 73

JO - Ecological economics

JF - Ecological economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -