Does transcranial direct current stimulation affect the learning of a fine sequential hand motor skill with motor imagery?

Jagna Sobierajewicz, Wojciech Jaskowski, Robert Henricus Johannes van der Lubbe

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractOther research output

Abstract

Learning a fine sequential hand motor skill, comparable to playing the piano or learning to type, improves not only due to physical practice, but also due to motor imagery. Previous studies revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor imagery independently affect motor learning. Other studies showed that training with motor imagery combined with anodal tDCS might generally enhance motor performance. In the present study, we investigated whether tDCS combined with motor imagery above the primary motor cortex influences sequence-specific learning of a fine hand motor skill. Four groups of participants were involved: an anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation group, and a control group without stimulation. A modified discrete sequence production (DSP) task was employed: the Go/NoGo DSP task. After a sequence of spatial cues, a response sequence had to be either executed, imagined or withheld. The task allows to estimate general learning effects in a practice phase, and sequence-specific learning effects in a test phase by comparing the execution of unfamiliar sequences, familiar imagined sequences, familiar withheld and familiar executed sequences. Results showed that the effects of anodal tDCS were already developing during the practice phase, while no sequence-specific effects were visible during the test phase. These findings confirm that anodal tDCS affects motor performance but they also reveal that it does not facilitate the influence of motor imagery on sequence learning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S55
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017
Event57th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research 2017 - The Hofburg, Vienna, Austria
Duration: 11 Oct 201715 Oct 2017
Conference number: 57

Fingerprint

Motor Skills
Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Hand
Learning
Motor Cortex
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Cues
Control Groups
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • creativity
  • event-related potentials
  • upper alpha band

Cite this

@article{93b2a8b6705644bbab9e34f0dcd69d9f,
title = "Does transcranial direct current stimulation affect the learning of a fine sequential hand motor skill with motor imagery?",
abstract = "Learning a fine sequential hand motor skill, comparable to playing the piano or learning to type, improves not only due to physical practice, but also due to motor imagery. Previous studies revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor imagery independently affect motor learning. Other studies showed that training with motor imagery combined with anodal tDCS might generally enhance motor performance. In the present study, we investigated whether tDCS combined with motor imagery above the primary motor cortex influences sequence-specific learning of a fine hand motor skill. Four groups of participants were involved: an anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation group, and a control group without stimulation. A modified discrete sequence production (DSP) task was employed: the Go/NoGo DSP task. After a sequence of spatial cues, a response sequence had to be either executed, imagined or withheld. The task allows to estimate general learning effects in a practice phase, and sequence-specific learning effects in a test phase by comparing the execution of unfamiliar sequences, familiar imagined sequences, familiar withheld and familiar executed sequences. Results showed that the effects of anodal tDCS were already developing during the practice phase, while no sequence-specific effects were visible during the test phase. These findings confirm that anodal tDCS affects motor performance but they also reveal that it does not facilitate the influence of motor imagery on sequence learning.",
keywords = "creativity, event-related potentials, upper alpha band",
author = "Jagna Sobierajewicz and Wojciech Jaskowski and {van der Lubbe}, {Robert Henricus Johannes}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/psyp.12950",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "S55",
journal = "Psychophysiology",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Does transcranial direct current stimulation affect the learning of a fine sequential hand motor skill with motor imagery? / Sobierajewicz, Jagna; Jaskowski, Wojciech; van der Lubbe, Robert Henricus Johannes.

In: Psychophysiology, Vol. 54, 12.2017, p. S55.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractOther research output

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does transcranial direct current stimulation affect the learning of a fine sequential hand motor skill with motor imagery?

AU - Sobierajewicz, Jagna

AU - Jaskowski, Wojciech

AU - van der Lubbe, Robert Henricus Johannes

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Learning a fine sequential hand motor skill, comparable to playing the piano or learning to type, improves not only due to physical practice, but also due to motor imagery. Previous studies revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor imagery independently affect motor learning. Other studies showed that training with motor imagery combined with anodal tDCS might generally enhance motor performance. In the present study, we investigated whether tDCS combined with motor imagery above the primary motor cortex influences sequence-specific learning of a fine hand motor skill. Four groups of participants were involved: an anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation group, and a control group without stimulation. A modified discrete sequence production (DSP) task was employed: the Go/NoGo DSP task. After a sequence of spatial cues, a response sequence had to be either executed, imagined or withheld. The task allows to estimate general learning effects in a practice phase, and sequence-specific learning effects in a test phase by comparing the execution of unfamiliar sequences, familiar imagined sequences, familiar withheld and familiar executed sequences. Results showed that the effects of anodal tDCS were already developing during the practice phase, while no sequence-specific effects were visible during the test phase. These findings confirm that anodal tDCS affects motor performance but they also reveal that it does not facilitate the influence of motor imagery on sequence learning.

AB - Learning a fine sequential hand motor skill, comparable to playing the piano or learning to type, improves not only due to physical practice, but also due to motor imagery. Previous studies revealed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor imagery independently affect motor learning. Other studies showed that training with motor imagery combined with anodal tDCS might generally enhance motor performance. In the present study, we investigated whether tDCS combined with motor imagery above the primary motor cortex influences sequence-specific learning of a fine hand motor skill. Four groups of participants were involved: an anodal, cathodal, and sham stimulation group, and a control group without stimulation. A modified discrete sequence production (DSP) task was employed: the Go/NoGo DSP task. After a sequence of spatial cues, a response sequence had to be either executed, imagined or withheld. The task allows to estimate general learning effects in a practice phase, and sequence-specific learning effects in a test phase by comparing the execution of unfamiliar sequences, familiar imagined sequences, familiar withheld and familiar executed sequences. Results showed that the effects of anodal tDCS were already developing during the practice phase, while no sequence-specific effects were visible during the test phase. These findings confirm that anodal tDCS affects motor performance but they also reveal that it does not facilitate the influence of motor imagery on sequence learning.

KW - creativity

KW - event-related potentials

KW - upper alpha band

U2 - 10.1111/psyp.12950

DO - 10.1111/psyp.12950

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 54

SP - S55

JO - Psychophysiology

JF - Psychophysiology

SN - 0048-5772

ER -