Abstract
Driving automation leads to a changed role for drivers, i.e. supervision, including now and then intervention - a role that humans are not particularly good at. New driver-vehicle interfaces can support drivers in their changed role. We tested three interface-concepts incorporating different type of stimuli to steer attention and evoke response. This study examined specifically the effects on driver-intervention to avoid collision after automation was terminated. Neither the audio-tactile interface combined with illumination, nor the audio-visual interface, revealed to provide additional intervention-support compared to a base-line audio interface. The results contribute to a better understanding of applying multimodality for developing adequate support and suggest that richer stimuli might negatively influence performance due to startle-responses and/or distraction. Richer stimuli feedback might however be beneficial within the broader spectrum of the changed driver's role (e.g. supervision) - for which further research is planned.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) |
| Pages | 1327-1332 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-5090-1821-5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jun 2016 |
| Event | 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV 2016 - Lindholmen Conference Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden Duration: 19 Jun 2016 → 22 Jun 2016 http://iv2016.org/ |
Conference
| Conference | 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV 2016 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | IV |
| Country/Territory | Sweden |
| City | Gothenburg |
| Period | 19/06/16 → 22/06/16 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- METIS-321582
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Driving automation & changed driver's task - effect of driver-interfaces on intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver