Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer vs Bare-Metal Stents on Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The COMFORTABLE AMI Randomized Trial

  • Lorenz Räber
  • , Henning Kelbaek
  • , Miodrag Ostojic
  • , Andreas Baumbach
  • , Dik Heg
  • , David Tüller
  • , Clemens von Birgelen
  • , Marco Roffi
  • , Aris Moschovitis
  • , Ahmed A. Khattab
  • , Peter Wenaweser
  • , Robert Bonvini
  • , Giovanni Pedrazzini
  • , Ran Kornowski
  • , Klaus Weber
  • , Sven Trelle
  • , Thomas F. Lüscher
  • , Masanori Taniwaki
  • , Christian M. Matter
  • , Bernard Meier
  • Peter Jüni, Stephan Windecker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Context: The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents remains controversial in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objective To compare stents eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer with bare-metal stents in primary PCI.

Design, Setting, and Patients: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial of 1161 patients presenting with STEMI at 11 sites in Europe and Israel between September 19, 2009, and January 25, 2011. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 12 months.

Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the biolimus-eluting stent (n = 575) or the bare-metal stent (n = 582).

Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related reinfarction, and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization at 1 year.

Results: Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year occurred in 24 patients (4.3%) receiving biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer and 49 patients (8.7%) receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.80; P = .004). The difference was driven by a lower risk of target vessel–related reinfarction (3 [0.5%] vs 15 [2.7%]; HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69; P = .01) and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (9 [1.6%] vs 32 [5.7%]; HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.59; P < .001) in patients receiving biolimus-eluting stents compared with those receiving bare-metal stents. Rates of cardiac death were not significantly different (16 [2.9%] vs 20 [3.5%], P = .53). Definite stent thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (0.9%) treated with biolimus-eluting stents and 12 patients (2.1%; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15-1.19; P = .10) treated with bare-metal stents.

Conclusion: Compared with a bare-metal stent, the use of biolimus-eluting stents with a biodegradable polymer resulted in a lower rate of the composite of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)777-787
JournalJAMA
Volume308
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • METIS-290171
  • IR-82389

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer vs Bare-Metal Stents on Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The COMFORTABLE AMI Randomized Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this