TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of heel apex position, apex angle and rocker radius on plantar pressure in the heel region
AU - Malki, Athra
AU - van Kouwenhove, Laurens
AU - Verkerke, Gijsbertus J.
AU - Dekker, Rienk
AU - Hijmans, Juha M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the participants of this study for their participation. This research is supported by Samenwerkingverband Noord-Nederland (SNN), the European Union (EU) and Provincie Groningen [OPSNN0146, 2017]. It is also funded by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology ( EIT ) Health [IndiRock'n Sole 211018, 2020]. The funder had no role in the study design, data-collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Introduction: Rocker shoes and insoles are used to prevent diabetic foot ulcers in persons with diabetes mellitus and loss of protective sensation, by reducing the plantar pressure in regions with high pressure values (>200 kPa) (e.g., hallux, metatarsal heads and heel). However, forefoot rocker shoes that reduce pressure in the forefoot inadvertently increase pressure in the heel. No studies focused on mitigating the negative effects on heel pressure by optimizing the heel rocker midsole, yet. Therefore, we analyze the effect of different heel rocker parameters on the heel plantar pressure. Methods: In-shoe pressure was measured, while 10 healthy participants walked with control shoe and 10 different heel rocker settings. Peak pressure was determined in 7 heel masks, for all shoes. Generalized estimating equations was performed to test the effect of the different shoes on the peak pressure in the different heel masks. Results: In the proximal heel, a rocker shoe with distal apex position, small rocker radius and large apex angle (100°), shows the largest significant decrease in peak pressure compared to rocker shoes with more proximally located apex positions. In the midheel and distal heel, the same rocker shoes or any other rocker shoes, analyzed in this study, do not reduce the PP more than 2 % compared to the control shoe. For the midheel and distal heel region with high pressure values (>200 kPa), rocker shoes alone are not the correct option to reduce the pressure to below 200 kPa. Conclusion: When using rocker shoes to reduce the pressure in the forefoot, a heel rocker midsole with a distal apex position, small rocker radius and apex angle of 100°, mitigates the negative effects on proximal heel pressure. For the midheel and distal heel, other footwear options as an addition or instead of rocker shoes are needed to reduce the pressure.
AB - Introduction: Rocker shoes and insoles are used to prevent diabetic foot ulcers in persons with diabetes mellitus and loss of protective sensation, by reducing the plantar pressure in regions with high pressure values (>200 kPa) (e.g., hallux, metatarsal heads and heel). However, forefoot rocker shoes that reduce pressure in the forefoot inadvertently increase pressure in the heel. No studies focused on mitigating the negative effects on heel pressure by optimizing the heel rocker midsole, yet. Therefore, we analyze the effect of different heel rocker parameters on the heel plantar pressure. Methods: In-shoe pressure was measured, while 10 healthy participants walked with control shoe and 10 different heel rocker settings. Peak pressure was determined in 7 heel masks, for all shoes. Generalized estimating equations was performed to test the effect of the different shoes on the peak pressure in the different heel masks. Results: In the proximal heel, a rocker shoe with distal apex position, small rocker radius and large apex angle (100°), shows the largest significant decrease in peak pressure compared to rocker shoes with more proximally located apex positions. In the midheel and distal heel, the same rocker shoes or any other rocker shoes, analyzed in this study, do not reduce the PP more than 2 % compared to the control shoe. For the midheel and distal heel region with high pressure values (>200 kPa), rocker shoes alone are not the correct option to reduce the pressure to below 200 kPa. Conclusion: When using rocker shoes to reduce the pressure in the forefoot, a heel rocker midsole with a distal apex position, small rocker radius and apex angle of 100°, mitigates the negative effects on proximal heel pressure. For the midheel and distal heel, other footwear options as an addition or instead of rocker shoes are needed to reduce the pressure.
KW - Diabetes mellitus
KW - Diabetic foot
KW - Diabetic foot ulcer
KW - Footwear
KW - Heel pressure
KW - Plantar pressure
KW - Prevention
KW - Rocker shoe
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175174964&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21036
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21036
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175174964
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 9
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 11
M1 - e21036
ER -